• Induction with IsaKRD in the MIDAS study yielded the highest pretransplant MRD-negativity rates ever reported in patients with myeloma.

  • The favorable efficacy-toxicity balance with IsaKRD induction portends promising outcomes with long-term follow-up of the MIDAS cohort.

Abstract

For patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, induction therapy with a quadruplet regimen before autologous transplant is the standard of care. The phase 3 IFM2020-02-MRD-adapted strategy (MIDAS) study assessed a minimal residual disease (MRD)–driven consolidation and maintenance strategy after induction with isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IsaKRD). We report safety and efficacy outcomes of six 28-day cycles of IsaKRD in 791 patients. The median age was 59 years; 13% had International Staging System (ISS) stage III, 5% Revised-ISS stage III, and 8% high-risk cytogenetics (Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome linear predictor cytogenetic score of >1). Overall, 96% (N = 757) of patients completed induction. The median CD34+ cell yield was 7 × 106/kg, with 94% of patients able to proceed with a potential tandem transplant. The best overall response rate was 95%. In the intent-to-treat population, 91% achieved a very good partial response or better after induction, with MRD-negativity rates of 63% at 10−5 and 47% at 10−6. During induction, 7 patients experienced disease progression, and 5 died due to disease progression (n = 1), cardiac events (n = 2), or other causes (n = 2). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (5%), and infections (7%); only 13% of patients reported any grade peripheral neuropathy. IsaKRD induction yielded deep responses and high MRD-negativity rates while ensuring successful stem cell collection, with no new safety signals. Continued follow-up of this ongoing study is required to confirm these findings. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04934475.

1.
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Moreau
P
,
Terpos
E
, et al
.
Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow up
.
Hemasphere
.
2021
;
5
(
2
):
e528
.
2.
Moreau
P
,
Attal
M
,
Hulin
C
, et al
.
Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
.
Lancet
.
2019
;
394
(
10192
):
29
-
38
.
3.
Moreau
P
,
Hulin
C
,
Perrot
A
, et al
.
Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and followed by daratumumab maintenance or observation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the CASSIOPEIA randomised controlled phase 3 trial
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2024
;
25
(
8
):
1003
-
1014
.
4.
Voorhees
PM
,
Sborov
DW
,
Laubach
J
, et al
.
Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2023
;
10
(
10
):
e825
-
e837
.
5.
Sonneveld
P
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Boccadoro
M
, et al
.
Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2024
;
390
(
4
):
301
-
313
.
6.
Goldschmidt
H
,
Mai
EK
,
Bertsch
U
, et al
.
Addition of isatuximab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (GMMG-HD7): Part 1 of an open-label multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 trial
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2022
;
9
(
11
):
e810
-
e821
.
7.
Gay
F
,
Musto
P
,
Rota-Scalabrini
D
, et al
.
Carfilzomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone or lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus autologous transplantation or carfilzomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (FORTE): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2021
;
22
(
12
):
1705
-
1720
.
8.
Mina
R
,
Musto
P
,
Rota-Scalabrini
D
, et al
.
Carfilzomib induction, consolidation, and maintenance with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preplanned cytogenetic subgroup analysis of the randomised, phase 2 FORTE trial
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2023
;
24
(
1
):
64
-
76
.
9.
Leypoldt
LB
,
Tichy
D
,
Besemer
B
, et al
.
Isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for the treatment of high-risk newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2024
;
42
(
1
):
26
-
37
.
10.
Touzeau
C
,
Perrot
A
,
Hulin
C
, et al
.
Daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone with tandem transplant for high-risk newly diagnosed myeloma
.
Blood
.
2024
;
143
(
20
):
2029
-
2036
.
11.
Gay
F
,
Roeloffzen
W
,
Dimopoulos
MA
, et al
.
Results of the phase III randomized Iskia trial: isatuximab-carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients [abstract]
.
Blood
.
2023
;
142
(
suppl 1
):
4
.
12.
Landgren
O
,
Hultcrantz
M
,
Diamond
B
, et al
.
Safety and effectiveness of weekly carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and daratumumab combination therapy for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the MANHATTAN nonrandomized clinical trial
.
JAMA Oncol
.
2021
;
7
(
6
):
862
-
868
.
13.
Callander
NS
.
Another quadruplet therapy for multiple myeloma: the beginning of the end for autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation?
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2024
;
11
(
6
):
e392
-
e393
.
14.
Costa
LJ
,
Chhabra
S
,
Medvedova
E
, et al
.
Minimal residual disease response-adapted therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MASTER): final report of the multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2023
;
10
(
11
):
e890
-
e901
.
15.
Perrot
A
,
Lauwers-Cances
V
,
Tournay
E
, et al
.
Development and validation of a cytogenetic prognostic index predicting survival in multiple myeloma
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2019
;
37
(
19
):
1657
-
1665
.
16.
Palumbo
A
,
Avet-Loiseau
H
,
Oliva
S
, et al
.
Revised International Staging System for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2015
;
33
(
26
):
2863
-
2869
.
17.
D’Agostino
M
,
Cairns
DA
,
Lahuerta
JJ
, et al
.
Second revision of the international staging system (R2-ISS) for overall survival in multiple myeloma: a European Myeloma Network (EMN) report within the HARMONY project
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2022
;
40
(
29
):
3406
-
3418
.
18.
Corre
J
. New classification for identifying HR Myeloma based oncytogenetic abnormalities.
Paper presented at: International Myeloma Society Congress
;
25-28 September 2024
. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
19.
Kumar
S
,
Paiva
B
,
Anderson
KC
, et al
.
International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2016
;
17
(
8
):
e328
-
e346
.
20.
National Cancer Institute
.
Near complete response of multiple myeloma of plasma cell leukemia (Code C123275)
. Accessed 8 September 2024. https://ncit.nci.nih.gov/ncitbrowser/ConceptReport.jsp?dictionary=NCI_Thesaurus&ns=ncit&code=C123275.
21.
Perrot
A
,
Lauwers-Cances
V
,
Corre
J
, et al
.
Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2018
;
132
(
23
):
2456
-
2464
.
22.
Fernández de Larrea
C
,
Kyle
R
,
Rosiñol
L
, et al
.
Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage
.
Blood Cancer J
.
2021
;
11
(
12
):
192
.
23.
Rodriguez-Otero
P
,
Moreau
P
,
Dimopoulos
MA
, et al
.
Daratumumab (DARA) + bortezomib/lenalidomide/ dexamethasone (VRd) in transplant-eligible (TE) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the PERSEUS trial [abstract]
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2024
;
42
(
suppl 16
):
7502
.
24.
Liu
Y
,
Xu
J
,
Yan
W
, et al
.
T(11;14) with multiple myeloma: Standard risk survival but slow and poor response
.
Ann Hematol
.
2024
;
103
(
12
):
5573
-
5581
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in via your Institution