• The SaO2/FiO2 ratio is a useful measure for ACS.

  • The bedside SaO2/FiO2 ratio is an inexpensive biomarker to assess ACS severity and guide transfer to the ICU.

Abstract

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) severity is inconsistently defined, and its clinical course is difficult to predict. This retrospective observational study evaluated the utility of the ratio of pulse oximetry oxygen saturation (SaO2) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (SaO2/FiO2) in adult patients with ACS and its association with the clinical outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer. Across all ACS hospitalizations at a tertiary medical center from 2017 to 2021, we characterized the SaO2/FiO2 ratio at 3 time points: emergency department (ED) presentation, ACS diagnosis, and antibiotic initiation. Of the 227 hospitalizations identified, 54% were female, the mean age was 29 years, 70% had hemoglobin SS, and 9% had obesity. Although ICU transfer was not strongly associated with the SaO2/FiO2 ratio at ED presentation (area under the curve [AUC], 0.59), it was strongly associated with the ratio at ACS diagnosis (AUC, 0.73) and antibiotic initiation (AUC, 0.74). Given the highest sensitivity at ACS diagnosis, a diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 cutoff of 310 was proposed for triaging likely ICU transfer (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 82%; adjusted odds ratio, 8.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.12-37.6; adjusted hazard ratio, 4.86; 95% CI, 1.91-12.4), with models adjusted for obesity, lung disease, and blood counts. This cutoff corresponds to an SaO2 acquired from pulse oximeter saturation <90% on 2 L/min nasal cannula support. We propose using the SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff of 310 prospectively as a simple bedside triage tool for adult patients with sickle cell disease hospitalized with ACS to be transferred to a higher level of care.

Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a leading cause of death among adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD).1-5 Episodes of ACS are marked by pain, shortness of breath, oxygen supplementation, prolonged hospitalizations, readmissions, and end-organ injury from vaso-occlusive disease.3,6-8 Although episodes of ACS may be initiated by infection, fat embolism, inflammation, infarction, or hypo-ventilation, the exact pathophysiology of ACS is incompletely understood.2,9,10 Standard treatment is supportive, including supplemental oxygen, pain medication, empiric antibiotics, and either simple or exchange transfusions.2,8,9 

Accurately predicting the clinical trajectory of ACS remains problematic.2,5 Whereas many patients present with mild symptoms and improve, some experience clinical deterioration very rapidly. Transfusion is a mainstay of ACS treatment. However, clinical practices vary regarding the decision to transfuse and the criteria for simple vs exchange transfusions.2,11-13 Expert guidelines recommend that the severity of ACS should determine when to treat with simple vs exchange transfusions.10,14 ACS severity is inconsistently defined, whether by the number of opacified lobes on chest radiography, increased work of breathing, hypoxemia despite supplemental oxygen, or the presence of pleural effusions.7,8 We hypothesized that peripheral oxygen saturation would be a reliable and objective measure of respiratory impairment and thus could better predict ICU transfer as a surrogate marker of respiratory failure in patients with ACS. Peripheral oxygen saturation is routinely measured throughout hospitalizations for ACS, and hypoxemia itself worsens ACS pathophysiology, creating a vicious cycle.9,15 

The ratio of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), approximated by pulse oximetry, to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), denoted as the SaO2/FiO2 ratio, has been used in emergency medicine and critical care settings for risk stratification and mortality prediction in patients with lung conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), pulmonary fibrosis, and COVID-19 pneumonia.16-28 The SaO2/FiO2 ratio approximates the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to FiO2 ratio but is noninvasive and easily measured at the bedside.21,22,27,29-37 For patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), the SaO2/FiO2 ratio was a better predictor of mortality than the PaO2/FiO2 ratio,16 and the SaO2/FiO2 ratio has already been incorporated into clinical practice with equations to convert between SaO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratios.29,38 Thus, the SaO2/FiO2 ratio is included in the new global definition of ARDS.39 We retrospectively calculated the SaO2/FiO2 ratio from ACS hospitalization clinical data to assess its association with ICU transfer.

Study design and sample

This retrospective observational study included all hospitalizations of adult patients coded with a primary or hospital-acquired diagnosis of ACS at the University of Chicago from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Hospitalizations were included if patients were aged ≥18 years at the time of admission and diagnosed with ACS by having at least 1 symptom (fever, chest pain, hypoxemia, cough, wheezing, or shortness of breath) and a new opacity on chest radiography, consistent with multiple expert guidelines.7,8,10 

Data collection

After identifying relevant hospitalizations, all data were collected via manual chart review and entered into a Research Electronic Data Capture database.40,41 Data included baseline patient demographics (sex, age, and race/ethnicity), past medical history (body mass index [BMI], smoking history, SCD type, SCD complications, and pulmonary comorbidities), and home oxygen support; oxygen saturation as measured by MX Series pulse oximeters as well as method of delivery and amount of supplemental oxygen (rate or FiO2) from emergency department (ED) presentation to 96 hours after ACS diagnosis; hospitalization laboratory values, antibiotic administrations, and transfusion requirements; and clinical outcomes of ICU transfer, hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission within 28 days of discharge, and inpatient mortality. SCD type was determined using standard laboratory testing (supplemental Table 1). A composite end point of ICU transfer or death was calculated but was equivalent to ICU transfer because all patients who died in the hospital were transferred to the ICU before passing away. Thus, this composite end point is hereafter referred to as ICU transfer.

SaO2/FiO2 calculations

SaO2 was acquired from pulse oximetry (SpO2) measurements recorded in the electronic medical record flow sheets. Every SpO2 measurement from ED presentation until the first 96 hours after ACS diagnosis was recorded. FiO2 was calculated based on the type of oxygen support. If the patient was on room air, FiO2 was 0.21. If the patient was on nasal cannula or partial rebreather, then the flow rate (liter per minute) was converted to FiO2 via the following equation18:

For patients on high-flow nasal cannula, bilevel positive airway pressure, or mechanical ventilation, the FiO2 was obtained from the electronic medical record flow sheet. Missing data were imputed by carrying forward the most recent value.

ACS severity

To evaluate the SaO2/FiO2 ratio in the context of ACS, we took several statistical approaches because there are multiple published definitions of ACS severity.7,42 These approaches included assessing the number of lobes with opacities, the type of transfusions used, and whether the patient was transferred to the ICU. Through manual abstraction and visual inspection, we assessed the number of lobes with opacities on chest radiography at ACS diagnosis.7 We also categorized the type of transfusion administered during the hospitalization as none, simple only, or red cell exchange (RCE).7 Transfusions were performed per clinicians’ judgment. Finally, we characterized whether the hospitalization included transfer to the ICU. We examined the association between the SaO2/FiO2 ratio and each of these 3 proxies for ACS severity: opacified lobes on chest radiography, use of RCE, and ICU transfer. Three key time points were evaluated in the patient’s clinical course to determine the utility of triaging a hospitalization based on the SaO2/FiO2 ratio: (1) presentation in the ED; (2) initiation of antibiotics for ACS; and (3) chest radiography confirmation of ACS diagnosis. Initiation of antibiotics may have preceded or followed ACS diagnosis.

Statistical analysis

Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics were explored by ACS hospitalization using descriptive statistics. BMI was categorized as underweight, normal, or overweight/obese, and normal BMI served as a reference for binary comparisons. Smoking history was dichotomized as never vs prior/current. SCD type was dichotomized as hemoglobin SS vs non-SS. Associations between demographic or clinical variables and ICU transfer were tested using multilevel logistic regression models, which accounted for clustering of hospitalizations at the patient level.

Subsequently, we compared the median SaO2/FiO2 ratio at the time of ACS diagnosis by key medical history characteristics (BMI, smoking history, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder), the number of opacified lobes at diagnosis on chest radiography, and the clinical decision of RCE or not. We calculated median SaO2/FiO2 ratios rather than mean, given the nonnormal distribution. After log-transforming SaO2/FiO2 ratios at diagnosis, we constructed univariate multilevel linear regression models to account for clustering of hospitalizations by patient to determine significant associations between key medical and clinical characteristics and the diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio. After aggregate analyses across all hospitalizations, we stratified hospitalizations by home oxygen support given the impact of supplemental oxygen on the SaO2/FiO2 ratio. We also compared key clinical outcomes of ICU transfer and inpatient mortality by the same key medical history characteristics and methods of ACS severity characterization using univariate multilevel logistic regression models to account for clustering of hospitalizations by patient.

Finally, we used the SaO2/FiO2 ratio at each of the 3 key time points (ED presentation, antibiotic initiation, and ACS diagnosis) to determine SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs for predicting ICU transfer using the Youden Index.43 Based on the time point with the strongest relationship to ICU transfer, we selected an SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff for patients overall as well as cutoffs after stratifying those with and without home oxygen support. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves for these SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs. We compared clinical outcomes of transfusion type, ICU transfer, LOS, inpatient mortality, and 28-day readmission by these cutoffs using univariate multilevel logistic and linear regression models to account for clustering of hospitalizations by patient. We also assessed relationships between ICU transfer and these SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs using univariate and multivariable multilevel logistic regression models. Models were clustered by patient and adjusted for demographics, clinical, and laboratory characteristics that were either significantly associated with ICU transfer or deemed clinically relevant. Thus, the final multivariable model included BMI category, smoking history, asthma history, number of opacified lobes, hemoglobin concentration, and platelet count at diagnosis. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable mixed parametric survival models to compare hospitalizations above and below each of these cutoffs to determine the hazard ratio for ICU transfer. Statistical analyses were done using Stata 16.1 (College Station, TX).

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the University of Chicago Institutional Review Board.

Demographic and clinical characteristics

There were 252 hospitalizations (136 patients) for ACS initially identified using primary and hospital-acquired diagnoses from admissions between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021. Twenty-five hospitalizations (10%) were excluded for not meeting the diagnostic criteria for ACS (ie, no new opacity on chest radiography). Thus, 227 hospitalizations (128 patients) were analyzed; 54% were female, the mean age at admission was 28.9 years (standard deviation, 9.7), and 70% had hemoglobin (Hb) SS (Table 1). BMI category was significantly associated with SCD type (P = .001), with higher proportions of patients with Hb SC and Hb Sβ+ having overweight and obese BMIs. Most patients (85%) had a prior ACS hospitalization. Of the hospitalizations in which COVID-19 infection status was assessed (n = 79), only 3 hospitalizations (4%) had current COVID-19 infection, and 4 hospitalizations (5%) had prior COVID infection; only 1 of these 7 hospitalizations (14%) included an ICU transfer. Platelet count at ACS diagnosis was lower for hospitalizations with ICU transfer than those without (284 000/μL vs 369 000/μL; P = .002), but hemoglobin concentration did not significantly differ (7.2 g/dL vs 7.7 g/dL; P = .12). Additionally, patients who were overweight or obese were more likely to be transferred to the ICU than those with normal BMI (36% vs 16%; P = .01).

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical characteristics for ACS hospitalizations by ICU transfer status

DemographicsNo ICU transfer, n = 175ICU transfer, n = 52P value 
Female sex 93 (53%) 30 (58%) .50 
Mean age (SD), y 28.7 (9.7) 29.7 (10.0) .59 
Non-Hispanic Black 175 (100%) 52 (100%) 
Medical history    
BMI (kg/m2   
Underweight (<18.5) 24 (14%) 12 (23%) .10  
Normal (18.5-24.9) 121 (69%) 23 (44%) 
Overweight (25-29.9) 18 (10%) 9 (17%) .01  
Obese (≥30) 12 (7%) 8 (15%)  
Smoking history   .32  
Never 119 (69%) 27 (53%)  
Former 26 (15%) 14 (27%)  
Current 28 (16%) 10 (20%)  
SCD type   .34§  
Hb SS 123 (70%) 36 (69%)  
Hb SC 13 (7%) 4 (8%)  
Hb Sβ+ 5 (3%) 5 (10%)  
Hb Sβ0 34 (19%) 7 (13%)  
Prior vaso-occlusive event 156 (89%) 46 (90%) .88 
Prior ACS 146 (83%) 47 (90%) .36 
Asthma 68 (39%) 24 (47%) .33 
COPD 1 (1%) 2 (4%) .15 
Splenic sequestration 27 (16%) 5 (10%) .60 
Surgical splenectomy 25 (14%) 5 (10%) .69 
Stroke 22 (13%) 7 (14%) .58 
Current medications    
Home oxygen 26 (15%) 17 (33%) .05 
Steroids 1 (1%) 2 (4%) .20 
Hydroxyurea 95 (54%) 27 (52%) .59 
l-Glutamine 10 (6%) 3 (6%) .98 
Voxelotor 3 (2%) 0 (0%) 
Crizanlizumab 1 (1%) 1 (2%) .38 
Laboratory values at diagnosis, mean (SD)    
White blood cell, ×103/μL 15.9 (6.2) 18.1 (7.6) .09 
Hemoglobin, g/dL 7.7 (1.5) 7.2 (1.5) .12 
Platelets, ×103/μL 369 (164) 284 (136) .002 
Nasal viral positive (%) 14 (11%) 5 (11%) .82 
Clinical outcomes    
ACS-directed antibiotics 172 (98%) 52 (100%) 
Simple transfusion only 121 (69%) 16 (31%) <.001 
Red cell exchange 10 (6%) 35 (67%) <.001 
LOS (SD), d 8.5 (7.4) 12.0 (9.8) .025 
28-day readmission 41 (23%) 11 (23%) .88 
DemographicsNo ICU transfer, n = 175ICU transfer, n = 52P value 
Female sex 93 (53%) 30 (58%) .50 
Mean age (SD), y 28.7 (9.7) 29.7 (10.0) .59 
Non-Hispanic Black 175 (100%) 52 (100%) 
Medical history    
BMI (kg/m2   
Underweight (<18.5) 24 (14%) 12 (23%) .10  
Normal (18.5-24.9) 121 (69%) 23 (44%) 
Overweight (25-29.9) 18 (10%) 9 (17%) .01  
Obese (≥30) 12 (7%) 8 (15%)  
Smoking history   .32  
Never 119 (69%) 27 (53%)  
Former 26 (15%) 14 (27%)  
Current 28 (16%) 10 (20%)  
SCD type   .34§  
Hb SS 123 (70%) 36 (69%)  
Hb SC 13 (7%) 4 (8%)  
Hb Sβ+ 5 (3%) 5 (10%)  
Hb Sβ0 34 (19%) 7 (13%)  
Prior vaso-occlusive event 156 (89%) 46 (90%) .88 
Prior ACS 146 (83%) 47 (90%) .36 
Asthma 68 (39%) 24 (47%) .33 
COPD 1 (1%) 2 (4%) .15 
Splenic sequestration 27 (16%) 5 (10%) .60 
Surgical splenectomy 25 (14%) 5 (10%) .69 
Stroke 22 (13%) 7 (14%) .58 
Current medications    
Home oxygen 26 (15%) 17 (33%) .05 
Steroids 1 (1%) 2 (4%) .20 
Hydroxyurea 95 (54%) 27 (52%) .59 
l-Glutamine 10 (6%) 3 (6%) .98 
Voxelotor 3 (2%) 0 (0%) 
Crizanlizumab 1 (1%) 1 (2%) .38 
Laboratory values at diagnosis, mean (SD)    
White blood cell, ×103/μL 15.9 (6.2) 18.1 (7.6) .09 
Hemoglobin, g/dL 7.7 (1.5) 7.2 (1.5) .12 
Platelets, ×103/μL 369 (164) 284 (136) .002 
Nasal viral positive (%) 14 (11%) 5 (11%) .82 
Clinical outcomes    
ACS-directed antibiotics 172 (98%) 52 (100%) 
Simple transfusion only 121 (69%) 16 (31%) <.001 
Red cell exchange 10 (6%) 35 (67%) <.001 
LOS (SD), d 8.5 (7.4) 12.0 (9.8) .025 
28-day readmission 41 (23%) 11 (23%) .88 

COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; HB, hemoglobin; SD, standard deviation.

Boldface values indicate P < .05.

Multilevel logistic regression model coefficient P value.

BMI was compared as underweight vs normal as well as overweight/obese vs normal in multilevel logistic regression models.

Smoking dichotomized into never vs prior/current in multilevel logistic regression model.

§

SCD type dichotomized into SS vs non-SS in multilevel logistic regression model.

Diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio, chest opacities, and transfusion type

At ACS diagnosis, chest radiography involved 1 lobe for 114 hospitalizations (50%), 2 lobes for 91 hospitalizations (40%), and ≥3 lobes for 22 hospitalizations (10%). Whereas 45 hospitalizations (20%) had no transfusions, 137 hospitalizations (60%) only included a simple transfusion, and 45 hospitalizations (20%) included RCE. Home oxygen support was noted in 43 hospitalizations (19%). The median diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio was lower for hospitalizations of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder or with home oxygen, as well as for those who had more opacified lobes on diagnostic chest radiography and those who received RCE (Table 2). These associations remained true for those without home oxygen, but only RCE use was associated with lower diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio for those with home oxygen. Hospitalizations of those who were overweight or obese or who had ≥3 opacified lobes on diagnostic radiography or received RCE were more likely to include an ICU transfer. Inpatient mortality (n = 4) was not frequent enough to test for significant associations with ACS severity.

Table 2.

Diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 and clinical outcomes by hospitalization characteristics

Medical historyMedian SaO2/FiO2 at diagnosis (IQR) ICU transfer (%), n = 52Inpatient death (%), n = 4
All admissions N = 227No home O2, n = 184Home O2, n = 43
BMI (kg/m2)       
Underweight (<18.5) 334 (273-388) 388 (334-452) 288 (246-321) 12 (33) 0 (0) 
Normal (18.5-24.9) 376 (313-452) 376 (324-452) 328 (270-338) 23 (16) 2 (1) 
Overweight (25-29.9) 334 (288-452) 445 (334-457) 288 (254-297) 9 (33)∗ 0 (0) 
Obese (≥30) 312 (270-450) 377 (271-464) 302 (247-373) 8 (40) 2 (10) 
Smoking history§       
Never 344 (310-452) 384 (324-452) 300 (254-331) 27 (18) 4 (3) 
Former 334 (283-452) 345 (297-457) 302 (259-334) 14 (35) 0 (0) 
Current 341 (291-443) 414 (331-460) 273 (262-297) 10 (26) 0 (0) 
Asthma      
Yes 331 (288-448) 366 (310-452) 288 (246-328) 24 (26) 1 (1) 
No 360 (316-452) 396 (334-457) 300 (270-334) 27 (20) 3 (2) 
COPD      
Yes 270 (123-288)∗∗ 123 (123-123)∗∗∗ 279 (270-288) 2 (67) 0 (0) 
No 345 (303-452) 382 (324-457) 297 (259-328) 49 (22) 4 (2) 
Home oxygen      
Yes 297 (259-328)∗∗∗ 17 (40) 0 (0) 
No 378 (324-455)   35 (19) 4 (2) 
Clinical characteristic      
Diagnostic chest imaging       
1 lobe 396 (321-457) 448 (338-462) 300 (262-331) 19 (17) 3 (3) 
2 lobes 338 (288-443)∗ 338 (310-443)∗∗ 286 (259-334) 21 (23) 0 (0) 
≥3 lobes 295 (262-345)∗∗∗ 310 (268-395)∗∗ 269 (209-300) 12 (55)∗∗ 1 (5) 
Red cell exchange      
Yes 282 (246-345)∗∗∗ 293 (255-370)∗∗∗ 254 (209-291)∗∗ 35 (78)∗∗∗ 2 (4) 
No 376 (324-452) 414 (334-457) 303 (276-334) 17 (9) 2 (1) 
Medical historyMedian SaO2/FiO2 at diagnosis (IQR) ICU transfer (%), n = 52Inpatient death (%), n = 4
All admissions N = 227No home O2, n = 184Home O2, n = 43
BMI (kg/m2)       
Underweight (<18.5) 334 (273-388) 388 (334-452) 288 (246-321) 12 (33) 0 (0) 
Normal (18.5-24.9) 376 (313-452) 376 (324-452) 328 (270-338) 23 (16) 2 (1) 
Overweight (25-29.9) 334 (288-452) 445 (334-457) 288 (254-297) 9 (33)∗ 0 (0) 
Obese (≥30) 312 (270-450) 377 (271-464) 302 (247-373) 8 (40) 2 (10) 
Smoking history§       
Never 344 (310-452) 384 (324-452) 300 (254-331) 27 (18) 4 (3) 
Former 334 (283-452) 345 (297-457) 302 (259-334) 14 (35) 0 (0) 
Current 341 (291-443) 414 (331-460) 273 (262-297) 10 (26) 0 (0) 
Asthma      
Yes 331 (288-448) 366 (310-452) 288 (246-328) 24 (26) 1 (1) 
No 360 (316-452) 396 (334-457) 300 (270-334) 27 (20) 3 (2) 
COPD      
Yes 270 (123-288)∗∗ 123 (123-123)∗∗∗ 279 (270-288) 2 (67) 0 (0) 
No 345 (303-452) 382 (324-457) 297 (259-328) 49 (22) 4 (2) 
Home oxygen      
Yes 297 (259-328)∗∗∗ 17 (40) 0 (0) 
No 378 (324-455)   35 (19) 4 (2) 
Clinical characteristic      
Diagnostic chest imaging       
1 lobe 396 (321-457) 448 (338-462) 300 (262-331) 19 (17) 3 (3) 
2 lobes 338 (288-443)∗ 338 (310-443)∗∗ 286 (259-334) 21 (23) 0 (0) 
≥3 lobes 295 (262-345)∗∗∗ 310 (268-395)∗∗ 269 (209-300) 12 (55)∗∗ 1 (5) 
Red cell exchange      
Yes 282 (246-345)∗∗∗ 293 (255-370)∗∗∗ 254 (209-291)∗∗ 35 (78)∗∗∗ 2 (4) 
No 376 (324-452) 414 (334-457) 303 (276-334) 17 (9) 2 (1) 

P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001.

IQR, interquartile range.

Statistical associations assessed with multilevel linear regression models of logarithmic transformation of diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio.

BMI dichotomized into underweight vs normal BMI as well as overweight/obese vs normal BMI in multilevel linear and logistic regression models for each column. Thus, 2 models were run for each column, and P values where indicated signify a significant difference between underweight and normal BMI or between overweight/obese and normal BMI.

§

Smoking dichotomized into never vs prior/current in multilevel linear and logistic regression models.

SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs

SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs were determined at each of the 3 key time points. Although the SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff of 429 at ED presentation was not strongly associated with subsequent ICU transfer (area under the curve [AUC], 0.59; sensitivity, 42%; specificity, 76%), the cutoff of 303 at antibiotic initiation (AUC, 0.74; sensitivity, 60%; specificity, 88%) and of 310 at ACS diagnosis (AUC, 0.73; sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 82%) were strongly associated with subsequent ICU transfer. The time points of antibiotic initiation and ACS diagnosis had roughly equivalent SaO2/FiO2 ratios (Figure 1), and antibiotic initiation preceded ACS diagnosis by at least 1 hour for 27% of hospitalizations. Thus, stratified cutoffs by home oxygen support were calculated based on ACS diagnosis because it had the highest sensitivity: 314 for those without home oxygen support (AUC, 0.69; sensitivity, 54%; specificity, 85%) and 276 for those with home oxygen support (AUC, 0.75; sensitivity, 65%; specificity, 85%).

Figure 1.

SaO2/FiO2 ratio across key hospitalization time points. S/F, SaO2/FiO2.

Figure 1.

SaO2/FiO2 ratio across key hospitalization time points. S/F, SaO2/FiO2.

Close modal

We compared clinical outcomes by the diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 cutoff of 310 and stratified cutoffs of 314 and 276 (Table 3). If the diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio was below the cutoff, patients more frequently received RCE. Given how the cutoffs were calculated, patients with a diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio below the cutoff were frequently transferred to the ICU. LOS was longer for those below the diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff of 310 but not after stratifying by home oxygen support. The 28-day readmission rate did not differ by diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio. Of the 4 patients who died while admitted, all were transferred to the ICU, and none of them died directly from ACS-related respiratory failure that was identifiable through retrospective chart review but instead from fat emboli syndrome, hyperhemolysis, cardiac arrest, and pulmonary intravascular talcosis with pulmonary hemorrhage.

Table 3.

Clinical outcomes by diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs

Clinical outcomesDiagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff
All admissions, N = 227No home O2, n = 184Home O2, n = 43
<310≥310P value <314≥314P value <276≥276P value 
Simple transfusion only, % 46 66 .005 40 66 .004 44 70 .09 
Red cell exchange, % 43 <.001 45 < .001 50 19 .05 
ICU transfer, % 49 11 <.001 45 11 < .001 69 22 .006 
Mean LOS, d 11.3 8.5 .03 9.6 8.5 .35 11.7 11.7 .92 
28-d readmission, % 26 22 .45 17 21 .55 31 41 .69 
Inpatient mortality, % .87 
Clinical outcomesDiagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff
All admissions, N = 227No home O2, n = 184Home O2, n = 43
<310≥310P value <314≥314P value <276≥276P value 
Simple transfusion only, % 46 66 .005 40 66 .004 44 70 .09 
Red cell exchange, % 43 <.001 45 < .001 50 19 .05 
ICU transfer, % 49 11 <.001 45 11 < .001 69 22 .006 
Mean LOS, d 11.3 8.5 .03 9.6 8.5 .35 11.7 11.7 .92 
28-d readmission, % 26 22 .45 17 21 .55 31 41 .69 
Inpatient mortality, % .87 

Boldface values indicate P < .05.

Multilevel logistic or linear regression models to determine P values.

Multilevel models for ICU transfer

Univariate multilevel logistic regression models indicate that all 3 diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs are significantly associated with ICU transfer: an odds ratio (OR) of 10.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.00-25.6) if <310; OR 9.97 (95% CI, 3.00-33.1) if <314 and not using home oxygen; and OR 8.08 (95% CI, 1.85-35.4) if <276 and using home oxygen. After adjusting for BMI, smoking status, asthma, opacified lobes, hemoglobin, and platelets at ACS diagnosis, multivariable multilevel logistic regression models indicated that all 3 diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs were still significantly associated with ICU transfer: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 6.52 (95% CI, 2.33-18.2) if <310; aOR 10.3 (95% CI, 1.59-66.7) if <314 and not using home oxygen; and aOR 7.24 (95% CI, 1.13-46.4) if <276 and using home oxygen. Within 24 hours of ACS diagnosis, 35% of hospitalizations with a diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio <310 transferred to the ICU (Figure 2), which equates to 90% oxygen saturation on 2 L/min nasal cannula support (Figure 3). Multivariable mixed parametric survivor models indicated that all 3 diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs were significantly associated with increased risk of ICU transfer: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 4.06 (95% CI, 2.14-7.70) if <310; aHR 4.59 (95% CI, 1.54-13.7) if <314 and not using home oxygen; and aHR 10.3 (95% CI, 1.98-53.2) if <276 and using home oxygen.

Figure 2.

Time to ICU transfer stratified by diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio without and with home oxygen support. S/F, SaO2/FiO2.

Figure 2.

Time to ICU transfer stratified by diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio without and with home oxygen support. S/F, SaO2/FiO2.

Close modal
Figure 3.

SaO2/FiO2 ratio by nasal cannula flow rate.

Figure 3.

SaO2/FiO2 ratio by nasal cannula flow rate.

Close modal

To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize ACS severity using the SaO2/FiO2 ratio. We have shown that the SaO2/FiO2 ratio is a powerful index for assessing ACS severity and clinical outcomes in SCD. The SaO2/FiO2 ratio at the time of diagnosis was associated with the number of lobes with opacities on chest radiography, the use of RCE transfusion, and ICU transfer. This simple bedside point-of-care measure shows promise as a potential marker of ACS severity and should be further explored prospectively to guide ICU transfer and RCE treatment decisions.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines from 2014 strongly recommend RCE transfusions for patients with SCD who have “rapid progression of ACS,” which they clarify as “oxygen saturation below 90% despite supplemental oxygen, increased respiratory distress, progressive pulmonary infiltrates, and/or decline in hemoglobin concentration despite simple transfusion,” although this is based on low-quality evidence.8 Dichotomizing ACS severity by transfusion type, in which severe ACS is treated with RCE and nonsevere ACS with simple transfusions, does not consider the center’s abilities to administer RCE or the clinical practices of local physicians.44 Instead, we propose using this simple bedside measure to help triage ACS severity given the ubiquitous nature of pulse oximeters across all centers and the objectivity of a calculated ratio. This retrospective study demonstrates the feasibility of obtaining the SaO2/FiO2 ratio in adult patients with ACS and the potential clinical utility of this measure in defining oxygenation cutoffs for patient care interventions such as ICU transfer or RCE.

We propose using the SaO2/FiO2 ratio to aid in clinical decision-making for patients with SCD hospitalized for ACS. A general approach could be used for all patients, or they could be stratified by whether they use home oxygen support. If a general approach is used, our data suggest considering ICU transfer for patients with a SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff of <310. This would include any patient on at least 3 L/min nasal cannula support at ACS diagnosis or those with an oxygen saturation <90% on 2 L/min. If a stratified approach is used based on home oxygen support, our data suggest an SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoff of <314 for those without home oxygen and <276 for those with home oxygen. This would include patients without home oxygen who are on at least 3 L/min nasal cannula support or those with an oxygen saturation <91% on 2 L/min, as well as those with home oxygen support on at least 4 L/min or with an oxygen saturation <91% on 3 L/min nasal. The SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs corresponds to PaO2/FiO2 ratios of 293, 298, and 252, respectively, based on existing literature.30 These are all within the range of PaO2/FiO2 ratios of 200 to 300 defining mild ARDS.45 Although transfer to the ICU mostly occurred within the first 36 hours after ACS diagnosis for the first 2 diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio cutoffs (<310 for all and <314 for those without home oxygen), half of patients with home oxygen support who had a diagnostic SaO2/FiO2 ratio <276 transferred to the ICU within 12 hours of ACS diagnosis. Additionally, hospitalizations that included an ICU transfer were more common for patients who were overweight or obese, which could relate generally to the roles of social determinants of health in patients with SCD or may be driven by restrictive physiology related to obesity.46-48 Further work is needed to better describe the impact of BMI on ACS, and future prospective studies could consider stratifying randomization by BMI.

The main limitation of this study is its retrospective study design at a single center. Although a total of 128 patients across 227 hospitalizations were included in this analysis, the results may be limited in its generalizability to other hospitals given the variation in clinical practice patterns, including when to initiate RCE.13 The 227 hospitalizations were distributed across the 3 hospitals at the University of Chicago campus: Center for Care and Discovery (38%), Mitchell Hospital (38%), and Comer Children’s Hospital (24%). Additionally, there were missing data in this retrospective chart review, which required the imputation of FiO2 for some of the SaO2/FiO2 ratios. Because of the retrospective nature, the SpO2 measurements could not be benchmarked to PaO2 in all study patients. We may also have missed ACS hospitalizations during the time period that were not coded with either primary or hospital-acquired ACS diagnoses. Furthermore, we were not able to fully assess for the presence of multisystem organ failure as described by Chaturvedi et al, given the incomplete documentation of all relevant clinical data.49 We plan to prospectively evaluate for this and for trends in hemoglobin and platelets over the ACS hospitalization in future studies. Furthermore, the total number of packed red blood cell units given by simple transfusion during hospitalization was not recorded. Ideally, categorization would have followed Ballas et al with up to 2 units of simple transfusion being mild ACS, 3 units simple transfusion being moderate, and RCE being severe,7 but we did not have this level of detail. Finally, the clinical decisions to perform an RCE or to transfer to the ICU in this retrospective study had some degree of subjectivity and depended on the clinical judgment of the physicians treating that patient.

ACS is a complex syndrome that encompasses several disorders that result in a similar clinical phenotype, including infection, fat emboli, pulmonary emboli, and vaso-occlusive sickling. There are variable clinical phenotypes that are not yet clearly delineated, spanning from patients who recover completely with limited intervention to those who decompensate very quickly. In the future, the diagnosis of ACS may shift toward methods without radiation exposure such as bedside ultrasound or auscultation.50,51 The SaO2/FiO2 ratio warrants further exploration in patients with SCD who present with ACS. It shows promise given how simply it is obtained and how it normalizes the SpO2 readings to the level of oxygen support. It relies on objective data rather than the more subjective interpretation of chest radiography lobe opacification number or the clinical practice of RCE. The study team partnered to create an easily accessible online SaO2/FiO2 ratio calculator to help improve real-time prediction in routine clinical practice.

Despite data demonstrating racial bias in SpO2 and higher rates of occult hypoxemia in Black patients than White patients,52,53 as well as concern regarding the accuracy of pulse oximetry when patients with SCD have acute worsening of their anemia given the shift in the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve,54 in our study, the SaO2/FiO2 ratio was associated with relevant clinical outcomes and measures of ACS severity in an entirely Black cohort of patients with SCD, further underscoring the robustness of its prognostic value. If escalating nasal cannula support to at least 3 L/min (or at least 4 L/min for those with home oxygen support), clinicians could consider prompt ICU transfer or RCE. Future prospective studies in both academic and community hospitals should evaluate the use of the SaO2/FiO2 ratio threshold to guide ICU transfer and RCE recommendations and evaluate its impact on clinical outcomes and patient safety in adults and children with SCD. The SaO2/FiO2 ratio is an accessible tool that can be used by clinicians at academic or community hospitals, regardless of their prior experience treating patients with SCD.

Contribution: A.W. designed the research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; M.W. and A.J.W. performed research and reviewed the manuscript; A.A. contributed vital analytical tools and reviewed the manuscript; and M.J.R. and G.L.-C. designed the research and reviewed the manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Austin Wesevich, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC 2115, Chicago, IL 60637; email: austin.wesevich@uchicagomedicine.org.

1.
Castro
O
,
Brambilla
D
,
Thorington
B
, et al
.
The acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease: incidence and risk factors. The Cooperative Study of Sickle Cell Disease
.
Blood
.
1994
;
84
(
2
):
643
-
649
.
2.
Vichinsky
EP
,
Neumayr
LD
,
Earles
AN
, et al
.
Causes and outcomes of the acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease. National Acute Chest Syndrome Study Group
.
N Engl J Med
.
2000
;
342
(
25
):
1855
-
1865
.
3.
Platt
OS
,
Brambilla
DJ
,
Rosse
WF
, et al
.
Mortality in sickle cell disease -- life expectancy and risk factors for early death
.
N Engl J Med
.
1994
;
330
(
23
):
1639
-
1644
.
4.
Thomas
AN
,
Pattison
C
,
Serjeant
GR
.
Causes of death in sickle-cell disease in Jamaica
.
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed
.
1982
;
285
(
6342
):
633
-
635
.
5.
Allareddy
V
,
Roy
A
,
Lee
MK
, et al
.
Outcomes of acute chest syndrome in adult patients with sickle cell disease: predictors of mortality
.
PLoS One
.
2014
;
9
(
4
):
e94387
.
6.
Ballas
SK
,
Lusardi
M
.
Hospital readmission for adult acute sickle cell painful episodes: frequency, etiology, and prognostic significance
.
Am J Hematol
.
2005
;
79
(
1
):
17
-
25
.
7.
Ballas
SK
,
Lieff
S
,
Benjamin
LJ
, et al
.
Definitions of the phenotypic manifestations of sickle cell disease
.
Am J Hematol
.
2010
;
85
(
1
):
6
-
13
.
8.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
. Evidence-based management of sickle cell disease: expert panel report.
National Institutes of Health
;
2014
Accessed 15 February 2023. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/sites/default/files/media/docs/sickle-cell-disease-report%20020816_0.pdf.
9.
Jain
S
,
Bakshi
N
,
Krishnamurti
L
.
Acute chest syndrome in children with sickle cell disease
.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol
.
2017
;
30
(
4
):
191
-
201
.
10.
Howard
J
,
Hart
N
,
Roberts-Harewood
M
,
Cummins
M
,
Awogbade
M
,
Davis
B
;
BCSH Committee
.
Guideline on the management of acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease
.
Br J Haematol
.
2015
;
169
(
4
):
492
-
505
.
11.
Emre
U
,
Miller
ST
,
Gutierez
M
,
Steiner
P
,
Rao
SP
,
Rao
M
.
Effect of transfusion in acute chest syndrome of sickle cell disease
.
J Pediatr
.
1995
;
127
(
6
):
901
-
904
.
12.
Mallouh
AA
,
Asha
M
.
Beneficial effect of blood transfusion in children with sickle cell chest syndrome
.
Am J Dis Child
.
1988
;
142
(
2
):
178
-
182
.
13.
Howard
J
.
Sickle cell disease: when and how to transfuse
.
Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program
.
2016
;
2016
(
1
):
625
-
631
.
14.
Miller
ST
.
How I treat acute chest syndrome in children with sickle cell disease
.
Blood
.
2011
;
117
(
20
):
5297
-
5305
.
15.
Setty
BNY
,
Stuart
MJ
,
Dampier
C
,
Brodecki
D
,
Allen
JL
.
Hypoxaemia in sickle cell disease: biomarker modulation and relevance to pathophysiology
.
The Lancet
.
2003
;
362
(
9394
):
1450
-
1455
.
16.
Patel
S
,
Singh
G
,
Zarbiv
S
,
Ghiassi
K
,
Rachoin
JS
.
Mortality prediction using SaO2/FiO2 ratio based on eICU database analysis
.
Crit Care Res Pract
.
2021
;
2021
:
6672603
.
17.
Adegunsoye
A
,
Oldham
JM
,
Chung
JH
, et al
.
Phenotypic clusters predict outcomes in a longitudinal interstitial lung disease cohort
.
Chest
.
2018
;
153
(
2
):
349
-
360
.
18.
Satici
MO
,
Islam
MM
,
Satici
C
, et al
.
The role of a noninvasive index ‘Spo2/Fio2’ in predicting mortality among patients with COVID-19 pneumonia
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2022
;
57
:
54
-
59
.
19.
Festic
E
,
Bansal
V
,
Kor
DJ
,
Gajic
O
;
US Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group: Lung Injury Prevention Study Investigators USCIITG–LIPS
.
SpO2/FiO2 ratio on hospital admission is an indicator of early acute respiratory distress syndrome development among patients at risk
.
J Intensive Care Med
.
2015
;
30
(
4
):
209
-
216
.
20.
Kim
JH
,
Baek
AR
,
Lee
SI
, et al
.
ROX index and SpO2/FiO2 ratio for predicting high-flow nasal cannula failure in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients: a multicenter retrospective study
.
PLoS One
.
2022
;
17
(
5
):
e0268431
.
21.
Ray
S
,
Rogers
L
,
Pagel
C
,
Raman
S
,
Peters
MJ
,
Ramnarayan
P
.
Pao2/Fio2 ratio derived from the Spo2/Fio2 ratio to improve mortality prediction using the pediatric index of mortality-3 score in transported intensive care admissions
.
Pediatr Crit Care Med
.
2017
;
18
(
3
):
e131
-
e136
.
22.
Slater
A
,
Straney
L
,
Alexander
J
,
Schell
D
,
Millar
J
;
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Paediatric Study Group and Centre for Outcomes and Resource Evaluation
.
The effect of imputation of PaO2/FIO2 from SpO2/FIO2 on the performance of the pediatric index of mortality 3
.
Pediatr Crit Care Med
.
2020
;
21
(
6
):
520
-
525
.
23.
Cresi
F
,
Maggiora
E
,
Lista
G
, et al
.
Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula on feeding intolerance in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: the ENTARES randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA Netw Open
.
2023
;
6
(
7
):
e2323052
.
24.
Zarama
V
,
Quintero
JA
,
Barbosa
MM
, et al
.
NEWS2, S/F-ratio and ROX-index at emergency department for the prediction of adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients: an external validation study
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2024
;
83
:
101
-
108
.
25.
Kim
JH
,
Suh
DI
,
Park
JD
.
S/F and ROX indices in predicting failure of high-flow nasal cannula in children
.
Pediatr Int
.
2022
;
64
(
1
):
e15336
.
26.
Gadrey
SM
,
Mohanty
P
,
Haughey
SP
, et al
.
Overt and occult hypoxemia in patients hospitalized with COVID-19
.
Crit Care Explor
.
2023
;
5
(
1
):
e0825
.
27.
Fukuda
Y
,
Tanaka
A
,
Homma
T
, et al
.
Utility of SpO2/FiO2 ratio for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure with bilateral opacities in the ICU
.
PLOS ONE
.
2021
;
16
(
1
):
e0245927
.
28.
García-Martínez
A
,
López-Barbeito
B
,
Coll-Vinent
B
, et al
.
Mortality in patients treated for COVID-19 in the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital during the first phase of the pandemic: derivation of a risk model for emergency departments
.
Emergencias
.
2021
;
33
(
4
):
273
-
281
.
29.
Bilan
N
,
Dastranji
A
,
Ghalehgolab Behbahani
A
.
Comparison of the Spo2/Fio2 ratio and the Pao2/Fio2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res
.
2015
;
7
(
1
):
28
-
31
.
30.
Rice
TW
,
Wheeler
AP
,
Bernard
GR
,
Hayden
DL
,
Schoenfeld
DA
,
Ware
LB
;
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network
.
Comparison of the Spo2/Fio2 ratio and the Pao2/Fio2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS
.
Chest
.
2007
;
132
(
2
):
410
-
417
.
31.
Catoire
P
,
Tellier
E
,
de la Rivière
C
, et al
.
Assessment of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio as a tool for hypoxemia screening in the emergency department
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2021
;
44
:
116
-
120
.
32.
Babu
S
,
Abhilash
KP
,
Kandasamy
S
,
Gowri
M
.
Association between SpO2/FiO2 ratio and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in different modes of oxygen supplementation
.
Indian J Crit Care Med
.
2021
;
25
(
9
):
1001
-
1005
.
33.
Ortiz
G
,
Bastidas
A
,
Garay-Fernández
M
, et al
.
Correlation and validity of imputed PaO2/FiO2 and SpO2/FiO2 in patients with invasive mechanical ventilation at 2600 m above sea level
.
Med Intensiva
.
2022
;
46
(
9
):
501
-
507
.
34.
Bonaventura
A
,
Mumoli
N
,
Mazzone
A
, et al
.
Correlation of SpO2/FiO2 and PaO2/FiO2 in patients with symptomatic COVID-19: an observational, retrospective study
.
Intern Emerg Med
.
2022
;
17
(
6
):
1769
-
1775
.
35.
Kumar
A
,
Aggarwal
R
,
Khanna
P
, et al
.
Correlation of the SpO2/FiO2 (S/F) ratio and the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia
.
Med Intensiva
.
2022
;
46
(
7
):
408
-
410
.
36.
Pandharipande
PP
,
Shintani
AK
,
Hagerman
HE
, et al
.
Derivation and validation of SpO2/FiO2 ratio to impute for PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score
.
Crit Care Med
.
2009
;
37
(
4
):
1317
-
1321
.
37.
Brown
SM
,
Grissom
CK
,
Moss
M
, et al
.
Nonlinear imputation of Pao2/Fio2 from Spo2/Fio2 among patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Chest
.
2016
;
150
(
2
):
307
-
313
.
38.
Wongsrichanalai
V
.
Correlation between the SpO2/FiO2 ratio and PaO2/FiO2 ratio in ARDS
.
Chest
.
2019
;
155
(
4
):
98A
.
39.
Matthay
MA
,
Arabi
Y
,
Arroliga
AC
, et al
.
A new global definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
2024
;
209
(
1
):
37
-
47
.
40.
Harris
PA
,
Taylor
R
,
Thielke
R
,
Payne
J
,
Gonzalez
N
,
Conde
JG
.
Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
.
J Biomed Inform
.
2009
;
42
(
2
):
377
-
381
.
41.
Harris
PA
,
Taylor
R
,
Minor
BL
, et al
.
The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners
.
J Biomed Inform
.
2019
;
95
:
103208
.
42.
Klings
ES
,
Steinberg
MH
.
Acute chest syndrome of sickle cell disease: genetics, risk factors, prognosis, and management
.
Expert Rev Hematol
.
2022
;
15
(
2
):
117
-
125
.
43.
Ruopp
MD
,
Perkins
NJ
,
Whitcomb
BW
,
Schisterman
EF
.
Youden Index and optimal cut-point estimated from observations affected by a lower limit of detection
.
Biom J
.
2008
;
50
(
3
):
419
-
430
.
44.
Novelli
EM
,
Gladwin
MT
.
Crises in sickle cell disease
.
Chest
.
2016
;
149
(
4
):
1082
-
1093
.
45.
Ruan
SY
,
Huang
CT
,
Chang
HT
, et al
.
Construct validity of PaO2/FiO2 ratios in defining acute respiratory distress syndrome
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
2022
;
205
(
3
):
364
-
366
.
46.
Hyacinth
HI
,
Gee
BE
,
Hibbert
JM
.
The role of nutrition in sickle cell disease
.
Nutr Metab Insights
.
2010
;
3
:
57
-
67
.
47.
Power-Hays
A
,
Patterson
A
,
Sobota
A
.
Household material hardships impact emergency department reliance in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease
.
Pediatr Blood Cancer
.
2020
;
67
(
10
):
e28587
.
48.
Klings
ES
,
Wyszynski
DF
,
Nolan
VG
,
Steinberg
MH
.
Abnormal pulmonary function in adults with sickle cell anemia
.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
2006
;
173
(
11
):
1264
-
1269
.
49.
Chaturvedi
S
,
Ghafuri
DL
,
Glassberg
J
,
Kassim
AA
,
Rodeghier
M
,
DeBaun
MR
.
Rapidly progressive acute chest syndrome in individuals with sickle cell anemia: a distinct acute chest syndrome phenotype
.
Am J Hematol
.
2016
;
91
(
12
):
1185
-
1190
.
50.
Colla
JS
,
Kotini-Shah
P
,
Soppet
S
, et al
.
Bedside ultrasound as a predictive tool for acute chest syndrome in sickle cell patients
.
Am J Emerg Med
.
2018
;
36
(
10
):
1855
-
1861
.
51.
Allen
B
,
Molokie
R
,
Royston
TJ
.
Early detection of acute chest syndrome through electronic recording and analysis of auscultatory percussion
.
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med
.
2020
;
8
:
4900108
.
52.
Sjoding
MW
,
Dickson
RP
,
Iwashyna
TJ
,
Gay
SE
,
Valley
TS
.
Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2021;385(26):2496]
.
N Engl J Med
.
2020
;
383
(
25
):
2477
-
2478
.
53.
Valbuena
VSM
,
Barbaro
RP
,
Claar
D
, et al
.
Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement among patients about to undergo extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 2019-2020
.
Chest
.
2022
;
161
(
4
):
971
-
978
.
54.
Caboot
JB
,
Allen
JL
.
Hypoxemia in sickle cell disease: significance and management
.
Paediatr Respir Rev
.
2014
;
15
(
1
):
17
-
23
.

Author notes

Original data are available on request from the corresponding author, Austin Wesevich (austin.wesevich@uchicagomedicine.org).

The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.

Supplemental data