Figure 5
Figure 5. DNA damage was assessed by γH2AX foci counting. (A) γH2AX foci are increased in 32D/ITD cells compared with 32D/WT and 32D cells. (B) γH2AX foci are increased in MOLM-14 and MV-4-11 cells (containing FLT3/ITD mutation) compared with REH (without FLT3/ITD mutation). Results of the foci counting are presented graphically showing the number of cells with fewer than 5 and more than 5 foci. (C) MV-4-11 cells were treated with 100 nM CEP-701 for 4 hours, followed by staining for γH2AX. Results are compared with those of untreated control. Left panel represents untreated and right panel represents CEP-701 treated cells. Graphic representation of foci showing a decrease in number of cells with more than 25 foci per cell in treated samples. The error bars represent plus or minus SEM.

DNA damage was assessed by γH2AX foci counting. (A) γH2AX foci are increased in 32D/ITD cells compared with 32D/WT and 32D cells. (B) γH2AX foci are increased in MOLM-14 and MV-4-11 cells (containing FLT3/ITD mutation) compared with REH (without FLT3/ITD mutation). Results of the foci counting are presented graphically showing the number of cells with fewer than 5 and more than 5 foci. (C) MV-4-11 cells were treated with 100 nM CEP-701 for 4 hours, followed by staining for γH2AX. Results are compared with those of untreated control. Left panel represents untreated and right panel represents CEP-701 treated cells. Graphic representation of foci showing a decrease in number of cells with more than 25 foci per cell in treated samples. The error bars represent plus or minus SEM.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal