Figure 3.
Donor chimerism kinetics by conditioning regimen, and comparison of serum IgE. (A) Latest donor chimerism by cell line for surviving patients stratified by conditioning regimen backbone. (B) Comparison of pre-HSCT and post-HSCT serum IgE (kU/L) by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. (C) Latest donor chimerism by cell line for surviving patients. Horizontal line represents median. (D) Proportion of patients with full (>90%) vs mixed chimerism by conditioning regimen backbone. (E) Proportion of patients with full (>90%) vs mixed chimerism by age at HSCT. Bu, busulfan; Mel, melphalan; Treo, treosulfan.

Donor chimerism kinetics by conditioning regimen, and comparison of serum IgE. (A) Latest donor chimerism by cell line for surviving patients stratified by conditioning regimen backbone. (B) Comparison of pre-HSCT and post-HSCT serum IgE (kU/L) by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. (C) Latest donor chimerism by cell line for surviving patients. Horizontal line represents median. (D) Proportion of patients with full (>90%) vs mixed chimerism by conditioning regimen backbone. (E) Proportion of patients with full (>90%) vs mixed chimerism by age at HSCT. Bu, busulfan; Mel, melphalan; Treo, treosulfan.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal