Figure 4.
Dynamic loading of CREBBP and EP300 during the CB-to-CC cell state transition. (A-B) Heat maps (A) and density plots (B) of regions with significantly (FDR <0.05) different loading of CREBBP (left) and EP300 (right) between CBs and CCs. (C) Number of peaks with dynamic loading (green) or unloading (blue) of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition. (D) Overlap of regions with differential loading of CREBBP or EP300 in CBs and CCs. (E) Quantification of the change in CREBBP loading between KAT-PM (R1446C, Y1482N, Y1503C) and WT cells over regions with dynamic loading of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition (regions from panel C). (F) Heat map of CREBBP loading in isogenic WT and CREBBP KAT-PM (average of R1446C, Y1482N, Y1503C) cells over regions with significantly increased CREBBP loading in CC compared with CB. ∗∗∗P < 2.2 × 10–16. (G) Hypergeometric gene set enrichment analysis (hGSEA) of genes associated with peaks with or without differential loading of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition (corresponding to panel C) or with significant loss of CREBBP loading in KAT-PM cells compared with isogenic WT controls. (H) TF motif enrichment analysis (HOMER) of peaks with or without differential loading of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition (corresponding to panel C). (I) Tracks showing the CD74 locus as a representative example of regions with significant (FDR < 0.05; highlighted in yellow) gain in CREBBP loading in the CB-to-CC transition and loss of CREBBP loading in KAT-PM cells compared with isogenic WT controls in both CRISPR engineered cell lines (RL and HT) and primary FL tumor cells. Tracks represent overlays of biological replicates.

Dynamic loading of CREBBP and EP300 during the CB-to-CC cell state transition. (A-B) Heat maps (A) and density plots (B) of regions with significantly (FDR <0.05) different loading of CREBBP (left) and EP300 (right) between CBs and CCs. (C) Number of peaks with dynamic loading (green) or unloading (blue) of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition. (D) Overlap of regions with differential loading of CREBBP or EP300 in CBs and CCs. (E) Quantification of the change in CREBBP loading between KAT-PM (R1446C, Y1482N, Y1503C) and WT cells over regions with dynamic loading of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition (regions from panel C). (F) Heat map of CREBBP loading in isogenic WT and CREBBP KAT-PM (average of R1446C, Y1482N, Y1503C) cells over regions with significantly increased CREBBP loading in CC compared with CB. ∗∗∗P < 2.2 × 10–16. (G) Hypergeometric gene set enrichment analysis (hGSEA) of genes associated with peaks with or without differential loading of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition (corresponding to panel C) or with significant loss of CREBBP loading in KAT-PM cells compared with isogenic WT controls. (H) TF motif enrichment analysis (HOMER) of peaks with or without differential loading of CREBBP or EP300 in the CB-to-CC transition (corresponding to panel C). (I) Tracks showing the CD74 locus as a representative example of regions with significant (FDR < 0.05; highlighted in yellow) gain in CREBBP loading in the CB-to-CC transition and loss of CREBBP loading in KAT-PM cells compared with isogenic WT controls in both CRISPR engineered cell lines (RL and HT) and primary FL tumor cells. Tracks represent overlays of biological replicates.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal