Table 3.

MRD status at last follow-up

MRD-negative (10−5) status*D-RVd, n (%)RVd, n (%)Odds ratio (95% CI)P
Intent-to-treat population     
 MRD-negative 53/104 (51.0) 21/103 (20.4) 4.07 (2.18-7.59) <.0001 
 MRD-negative with ≥CR 49/104 (47.1) 19/103 (18.4) 3.89 (2.07-7.33) <.0001 
In patients achieving ≥CR 49/79 (62.0) 19/59 (32.2) 3.57 (1.72-7.44) .0006 
MRD-evaluable population 53/77 (68.8) 21/65 (32.3) 4.47 (2.19-9.11) <.0001 
MRD-negative (10−5) status*D-RVd, n (%)RVd, n (%)Odds ratio (95% CI)P
Intent-to-treat population     
 MRD-negative 53/104 (51.0) 21/103 (20.4) 4.07 (2.18-7.59) <.0001 
 MRD-negative with ≥CR 49/104 (47.1) 19/103 (18.4) 3.89 (2.07-7.33) <.0001 
In patients achieving ≥CR 49/79 (62.0) 19/59 (32.2) 3.57 (1.72-7.44) .0006 
MRD-evaluable population 53/77 (68.8) 21/65 (32.3) 4.47 (2.19-9.11) <.0001 

MRD data are from last follow-up at a median follow-up of 22.1 months.

*

The threshold of MRD negativity was defined as 1 tumor cell per 105 white cells. MRD status is based on assessment of bone marrow aspirates by NGS in accordance with IMWG criteria. The MRD-evaluable population included patients who had both baseline (with clone identified/calibrated) and postbaseline MRD (with negative, positive, or indeterminate result) samples taken (D-RVd group, n = 77; RVd group, n = 65). Patients with a missing or inconclusive assessment were considered positive for MRD.

Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common odds ratio for stratified tables is used. The stratification factors are ISS stage (I, II, III) and creatinine clearance (CrCl [30-50 mL/min or > 50 mL/min]) at randomization. An odds ratio >1 indicates an advantage for the daratumumab group.

P values were calculated from the Fisher exact test.