Table 3.

Risk factor analysis for survival at relapse among 75 patients with relapsed BL/B-AL diagnosed between 2001 and 2016: univariate analysis

CharacteristicsPatients, nEvent, nSurvival at 4 y, %P
Initial CNS involvement     
 Positive 20 18 10 ± 7 .13 
 Negative 55 37 33 ± 6  
Progression/relapse during initial therapy     
 Yes 28 25 11 ± 7 .001 
 No 47 30 36 ± 7  
Initial therapy branch     
 R1/R2 14 50 ± 13 .017 
 R3/R4 61 48 21 ± 5  
Rituximab during initial therapy (n = 70)     
 No 60 42 30 ± 6 .04 
 Yes 10 10 ± 9  
CNS involvement at relapse     
 Positive 22 18 18 ± 8 .56 
 Negative 53 37 30 ± 6  
BM at relapse     
 Positive 26 18 31 ± 9 .91 
 Negative 48 36 25 ± 6  
Rituximab in relapse (n = 63)     
 No 13 13  .016 
 Yes 55 35 36 ± 6  
Progression during re-induction (n = 68)     
 No 36 17 53 ± 8 <.001 
 Yes 32 31 3 ± 3  
CR before SCT (SCT n = 46)     
 Yes 30 11 63 ± 9 <.001 
 No 16 15 6 ± 6  
Reinduction regimen (n = 71)     
 VICI 15 67 ± 12 .003 
 All other 56 46 18 ± 5  
CharacteristicsPatients, nEvent, nSurvival at 4 y, %P
Initial CNS involvement     
 Positive 20 18 10 ± 7 .13 
 Negative 55 37 33 ± 6  
Progression/relapse during initial therapy     
 Yes 28 25 11 ± 7 .001 
 No 47 30 36 ± 7  
Initial therapy branch     
 R1/R2 14 50 ± 13 .017 
 R3/R4 61 48 21 ± 5  
Rituximab during initial therapy (n = 70)     
 No 60 42 30 ± 6 .04 
 Yes 10 10 ± 9  
CNS involvement at relapse     
 Positive 22 18 18 ± 8 .56 
 Negative 53 37 30 ± 6  
BM at relapse     
 Positive 26 18 31 ± 9 .91 
 Negative 48 36 25 ± 6  
Rituximab in relapse (n = 63)     
 No 13 13  .016 
 Yes 55 35 36 ± 6  
Progression during re-induction (n = 68)     
 No 36 17 53 ± 8 <.001 
 Yes 32 31 3 ± 3  
CR before SCT (SCT n = 46)     
 Yes 30 11 63 ± 9 <.001 
 No 16 15 6 ± 6  
Reinduction regimen (n = 71)     
 VICI 15 67 ± 12 .003 
 All other 56 46 18 ± 5  

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal