Table 1. Comparison of Bland-Altman... | American Society of Hematology

Table 1.

Comparison of Bland-Altman statistics for different R2 and R2^*methods

Method	Bias, %	Standard deviation, %	P value vs St Pierre et al¹⁸	95% confidence interval, %
R2^*	1	23	.21	−46-44
R2 linear	−4	26	.43	−55-46
R2 nonlinear	−6	20^*	.08	−46-34
R2′	−8	23	.24	−54-38
Average (R2, R2^*)	−3	20	.08	−43-37
R2 St Pierre et al¹⁸	−3	27	—	−56-50

Method	Bias, %	Standard deviation, %	P value vs St Pierre et al¹⁸	95% confidence interval, %
R2^*	1	23	.21	−46-44
R2 linear	−4	26	.43	−55-46
R2 nonlinear	−6	20^*	.08	−46-34
R2′	−8	23	.24	−54-38
Average (R2, R2^*)	−3	20	.08	−43-37
R2 St Pierre et al¹⁸	−3	27	—	−56-50

— indicates no comparison possible.

P = .15 versus R2 linear.