Table 1.

Methods for the genetic diagnosis of APL


Cellular level

Target aberration

Methods

Time required, h

Main advantages

Main drawbacks
Chromosomes       
  t(15;17)   Karyotyping   16-48   Highly specific   24-48 h cultures needed; cryptic fusions undetected (false negatives); need of good quality methaphases  
  t(15;17)   FISH   6-24   No need of dividing cells   No information on the type of PML/RARα fusion  
DNA  PML and RARα genes   Southern blot   96-168   Highly specific   Time consuming; laborious  
RNA  PML/RARα fusion   RT-PCR   4-6   Rapid; highly sensitive; defines targets for MRD   Poor RNA yield at dx; contamination and artifacts (false positives)  
Nucleus
 
Microspeckled nuclear distribution of the PML protein
 
Immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry
 
2-3
 
Rapid; simple; low cost
 
Artifacts due to cellular degradation, no information on the type of PML/RARα fusion
 

Cellular level

Target aberration

Methods

Time required, h

Main advantages

Main drawbacks
Chromosomes       
  t(15;17)   Karyotyping   16-48   Highly specific   24-48 h cultures needed; cryptic fusions undetected (false negatives); need of good quality methaphases  
  t(15;17)   FISH   6-24   No need of dividing cells   No information on the type of PML/RARα fusion  
DNA  PML and RARα genes   Southern blot   96-168   Highly specific   Time consuming; laborious  
RNA  PML/RARα fusion   RT-PCR   4-6   Rapid; highly sensitive; defines targets for MRD   Poor RNA yield at dx; contamination and artifacts (false positives)  
Nucleus
 
Microspeckled nuclear distribution of the PML protein
 
Immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry
 
2-3
 
Rapid; simple; low cost
 
Artifacts due to cellular degradation, no information on the type of PML/RARα fusion
 

FISH indicates fluorescence in situ hybridization; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; MRD, minimal residual disease; dx, diagnosis.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal