Table 1.

Overview of response of RA-resistant cells to RA and TNF or HDAC inhibitor


Cell line

Mutation position/observed change

Result of mutation

ATRA activation of RARB

PML/RAR degraded in response to 72 h of RA?

Differentiate in response to RA and TNF?

Differentiate in response to inhibitors of HDAC and RA?
UF-1   276 LBD   Arg-Trp   +/−   —   +   —  
MRA1   410 LBD   Ile-Thr   +/−   +/−   +   +  
MR4   398 LBD   Leu-Pro   —   —   +/−   +/−  
MR2   Altered PML/RAR binding profile   —   +   +   +   +/−  
MR6
 
Altered PML/RAR binding profile
 

 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+/−
 

Cell line

Mutation position/observed change

Result of mutation

ATRA activation of RARB

PML/RAR degraded in response to 72 h of RA?

Differentiate in response to RA and TNF?

Differentiate in response to inhibitors of HDAC and RA?
UF-1   276 LBD   Arg-Trp   +/−   —   +   —  
MRA1   410 LBD   Ile-Thr   +/−   +/−   +   +  
MR4   398 LBD   Leu-Pro   —   —   +/−   +/−  
MR2   Altered PML/RAR binding profile   —   +   +   +   +/−  
MR6
 
Altered PML/RAR binding profile
 

 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+/−
 

Compilation of data showing genetic lesions in RA-resistant APL cells and their sensitivity to RA and TNF or histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor treatment. Results show that several cell lines resistant to RA and HDAC inhibitors were found to respond well to RA and TNF treatment. Table is based on both new and previously published data.5,35  ATRA indicates all-trans retinoic acid; RARB, retinoic acid receptor β; LBD, ligand-binding domain; +/−, weak response; and—, no response.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal