Table 2.

Erythroid response to treatment in eligible subjects at week 12



Arm A: rHuEPO + rHuG-CSF

Arm B: supportive care
Responders; n = 10

Major response; n = 2
Minor response; n = 8
Nonresponders; n = 14
All subjects; n = 26
FAB classification, n     
RA   1   2   3   9  
RARS   1   5   7   11  
RAEB   0   1   4   6  
RBC transfusion dependent, n, yes/no   0/2   3/5   14/0   24/2  
Hemoglobin concentration, g/L, mean ± SEM
 
126 ± 5
 
98 ± 7
 
83 ± 13
 
88 ± 12
 


Arm A: rHuEPO + rHuG-CSF

Arm B: supportive care
Responders; n = 10

Major response; n = 2
Minor response; n = 8
Nonresponders; n = 14
All subjects; n = 26
FAB classification, n     
RA   1   2   3   9  
RARS   1   5   7   11  
RAEB   0   1   4   6  
RBC transfusion dependent, n, yes/no   0/2   3/5   14/0   24/2  
Hemoglobin concentration, g/L, mean ± SEM
 
126 ± 5
 
98 ± 7
 
83 ± 13
 
88 ± 12
 

The mean hemoglobin concentration (± SEM) among all responders was 104 ± 13 g/L.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal