Table 2.

Comparison of the cytogenetic response at 1 and 2 years

Cytogenetic responseAfter 1 y, no. (%)After 2 y, no. (%)
IFN-α + LDACIFN-αIFN-α + LDACIFN-α
Nonevaluable 81  (29) 91  (35) 76  (28) 89  (34)  
None, 0 Ph 51  (18) 56  (21) 50  (18) 50  (19)  
Minimal, 1%-32%, Ph 40  (14) 45  (17) 31  (11) 42  (16) 
Minor, 33%-65% Ph 44  (16) 36  (14) 40  (14) 35  (13)  
Partial, 66%-99% Ph 38  (14) 28  (11) 39  (14) 27  (10)  
Complete, 100% Ph 21  (8)* 7  (3)* 39  (14) 20  (8) 
Total 275 263 275 263  
Major, 66%-100% Ph 59  (21) 35  (13) 78  (28)2-153 47  (18)2-153 
Cytogenetic responseAfter 1 y, no. (%)After 2 y, no. (%)
IFN-α + LDACIFN-αIFN-α + LDACIFN-α
Nonevaluable 81  (29) 91  (35) 76  (28) 89  (34)  
None, 0 Ph 51  (18) 56  (21) 50  (18) 50  (19)  
Minimal, 1%-32%, Ph 40  (14) 45  (17) 31  (11) 42  (16) 
Minor, 33%-65% Ph 44  (16) 36  (14) 40  (14) 35  (13)  
Partial, 66%-99% Ph 38  (14) 28  (11) 39  (14) 27  (10)  
Complete, 100% Ph 21  (8)* 7  (3)* 39  (14) 20  (8) 
Total 275 263 275 263  
Major, 66%-100% Ph 59  (21) 35  (13) 78  (28)2-153 47  (18)2-153 

Data are presented as number and percentage. The response rate is calculated on all randomized cases, according to the intention-to-treat principle. The overall response rate was slightly better in the IFN-α-plus-LDAC arm than in the IFN-α arm (P = .07 at 1 year and P = .05 at 2 years, χ2test). Moreover, in the IFN-α-plus-LDAC arm, there were more complete responses (P = .009 and P = .012) and more major responses (P = .014 and P= .003).

Abbreviations are explained in Table 1.

*

P = .009.

P = .012.

P = .014.

F2-153

P = .003.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal