Table 1.

Comparison of colony formation from different sources of hematopoietic progenitors

Day-8 coloniesDay-2
CFU-E
SampleBFU-EGMGEMMMastTotal
Muscle, (2 × 104/dish) 1 ± 1 27 ± 3 2 ± 1 2 ± 1 34 ± 1 3 ± 1 
BM, (2 × 103/dish) 3 ± 0 23 ± 2 2 ± 1 2 ± 1 30 ± 3 189 ± 12 
PB, (2 × 105/dish) 8 ± 1 3 ± 1 2 ± 1 17 ± 1 32 ± 3 
Day-8 coloniesDay-2
CFU-E
SampleBFU-EGMGEMMMastTotal
Muscle, (2 × 104/dish) 1 ± 1 27 ± 3 2 ± 1 2 ± 1 34 ± 1 3 ± 1 
BM, (2 × 103/dish) 3 ± 0 23 ± 2 2 ± 1 2 ± 1 30 ± 3 189 ± 12 
PB, (2 × 105/dish) 8 ± 1 3 ± 1 2 ± 1 17 ± 1 32 ± 3 

Mac-1+ cells were removed from the mononuclear cells by immunomagnetic separation17 to reduce the background monocyte/macrophage population. For day-8 colony formation, designated numbers of cells were plated in quadruplicate in the presence of thrombopoietin, steel factor, erythropoietin, IL-11, and IL-3. For CFU-E assay, 5 × 104 cells were plated per dish. Data represent the mean and SD of values obtained from 4 dishes. Two additional experiments showed similar results.

BFU-E indicates erythroid burst-forming units; GM, granulocyte and/or macrophage colonies; GEMM, mixed colonies containing erythroid and myeloid cells and megakaryocytes; CFU-E, erythroid colony-forming units; BM, bone marrow; PB, peripheral blood.