Table 1.

Expression of CD11b During Stimulation of Neutrophils

Condition C Day 0 P Day 0 C Day 4 P Day 4
PMA (200 ng/mL)  2.72 ± 0.34  2.77 ± 0.35  2.5 ± 0.43  2.36 ± 0.27  
fMLP (10−6mol/L)  3.53 ± 0.61  2.61 ± 0.31  2.71 ± 0.33 2.09 ± 0.23  
PAF (2 × 10−6 mol/L) 5.39 ± 0.77  4.15 ± 0.52  3.83 ± 0.36 3.58 ± 0.07 
Condition C Day 0 P Day 0 C Day 4 P Day 4
PMA (200 ng/mL)  2.72 ± 0.34  2.77 ± 0.35  2.5 ± 0.43  2.36 ± 0.27  
fMLP (10−6mol/L)  3.53 ± 0.61  2.61 ± 0.31  2.71 ± 0.33 2.09 ± 0.23  
PAF (2 × 10−6 mol/L) 5.39 ± 0.77  4.15 ± 0.52  3.83 ± 0.36 3.58 ± 0.07 

Neutrophil upregulation of CD11b was measured in response to PMA (200 ng/mL), fMLP (1 × 10−6 mol/L) and PAF (2 × 10−6 mol/L) as described in Materials and Methods. There appeared to be a reduced upregulation of CD11b on treated volunteer day 4, but this was not statistically significant for any stimulus. There also appeared a difference between control day 0 and control day 4 for the PAF-stimulated expression of CD11b, but this was not statistically significant. Data represent the ratio of stimulated CD11b expression to baseline CD11b expression (mean channel fluorescence); n = 6 (matched pairs); mean ± SEM.

Abbreviations: C, control; P, treated volunteer.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal