Table 3.

Effect of rhG-CSF therapy on neutrophil and monocyte O2 generation

Stimulus used for O2 generationGroup 1
0-3 months (n = 8)
Group 2
6-12 months (n = 8)
NeutrophilsMonocytesNeutrophilsMonocytes
PMA, % 48 ± 13 30 ± 8 73.5 ± 10 67.5 ± 12 
 P < .01 P < .01 P < .03 (PR) P < .04 (PR) 
fMLP, % 32 ± 19 48 ± 10 195 ± 40 104 ± 12 
 P < .01 (n = 4) P < .01 P < .05 (CR) P = NS (CR) 
Stimulus used for O2 generationGroup 1
0-3 months (n = 8)
Group 2
6-12 months (n = 8)
NeutrophilsMonocytesNeutrophilsMonocytes
PMA, % 48 ± 13 30 ± 8 73.5 ± 10 67.5 ± 12 
 P < .01 P < .01 P < .03 (PR) P < .04 (PR) 
fMLP, % 32 ± 19 48 ± 10 195 ± 40 104 ± 12 
 P < .01 (n = 4) P < .01 P < .05 (CR) P = NS (CR) 

We measured O2 generation stimulated by either PMA or fMLP in neutrophils and monocytes obtained from controls and GSD type 1b patients. Patient O2generation is expressed as the percentage of control O2 generation (mean ± SEM). Patients in group 1 were tested within 3 months of starting cytokine therapy, and patients in group 2 were tested after 6-12 months of therapy. TheP value is the difference between the mean activity for patient's cells and control cells, and P < .05 indicates significant difference. PR indicates that O2 generation is improved to more than 50% of control, and CR indicates that O2generation is equivalent to or better than control. NS indicates not significant.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal