Correlation between I-PET and F-PET results
| . | 88 patients . | F-PET negative, no. (%) . | F-PET positive, no. (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-PET overall | |||
| I-PET negative | 63 | 62 (98.4) | 1 (1.6) |
| I-PET positive | 25 | 15 (60.0) | 10 (40.0) |
| I-PET after 2 courses | 58 | ||
| I-PET negative | 39 | 39 (100) | 0 (0) |
| I-PET positive | 19 | 12 (63.2) | 7 (36.8) |
| I-PET after 3 or 4 courses | 30 | ||
| I-PET negative | 24 | 23 (95.8) | 1 (4.2) |
| . | 88 patients . | F-PET negative, no. (%) . | F-PET positive, no. (%) . |
|---|---|---|---|
| I-PET overall | |||
| I-PET negative | 63 | 62 (98.4) | 1 (1.6) |
| I-PET positive | 25 | 15 (60.0) | 10 (40.0) |
| I-PET after 2 courses | 58 | ||
| I-PET negative | 39 | 39 (100) | 0 (0) |
| I-PET positive | 19 | 12 (63.2) | 7 (36.8) |
| I-PET after 3 or 4 courses | 30 | ||
| I-PET negative | 24 | 23 (95.8) | 1 (4.2) |
Predictive values: NPV, 82.5%; PPV, 36%; specificity, 76.5%; and sensitivity, 45%.
NPV indicates negative predictive value; and PPV, positive predictive value.