Table 3

Risk factors investigated for their association with leukemic progression in ET and PV: distribution in case patients who progressed to AML and control patients who did not

CharacteristicCases (n = 64)Controls (n = 271)P
ET/PV 35 (55%)/29 (45%) 158 (58%)/113 (42%)  
Age, y* 60.5 (16-81) 56 (13-89) .002 
Sex, male/female 27 (42%)/37 (58%) 95 (35%)/176 (65%) .4 
WBC* 10.8 (5-29) 8.7 (4.1-21) < .001 
    > 10 × 109/L 31 (55%) 109 (41%) .03 
    > 15 × 109/L 9 (16%) 24 (9%) .06 
Abnormal karyotype 4/29 (14%) 11/174 (6.5%) .5 
JAK2 mutation 38/50 (76%) 150/248 (60%) .03 
JAK2 genotype (rs12340895) 
    CC 24 (39%) 92 (35%) .8 
    CG 26 (42%) 119 (45%)  
    GG 12 (19%) 51 (19%)  
Exposure to cytoreductive agents 
    No exposure 1 (1.5%) 60 (22%) < .001 
    HU only 40 (62.5%) 164 (60.5%)  
    Other agents alone or in combination 23 (36%) 47 (17.5%)  
Detail of cytoreductive agents other than HU 
    32P alone or in combination 12 (19%) 42 (16%) .6 
    Alkylators alone or in combination 13 (20%) 12 (4%) < .001 
    HU plus alkylators and/or 3218 (28%) 34 (12.5%) .003 
Cumulated exposure to cytoreductive agents 
    HU cumulated dose (grams; n = 187)* 1956 (17-6048) 3223 (50-11882) < .001 
    Months on HU (n = 254)* 68 (1.2-213) 133 (2.8-291) < .001 
    Months on alkylating agents (n = 15)* 30 (5-202) 41 (1-164) NC 
    32P cumulated dose (mCi; n = 41)* 7.0 (3.5-15.2) 2.7 (2.3-10.8) NC 
DNA repair SNPs 
    ERCC2 (XPD) Lys751Gln: CC/AA + AC (R) 16 (25%)/47 (75%) 25 (9%)/245 (91%) < .001 
    ERCC5 Asp1104His: GC + CC/GG (D) 26 (41%)/37 (59%) 120 (46%)/143 (54%) .5 
    XPC Ala499Val: TT/CC + CT (R) 8 (14%)/50 (86%) 18 (7%)/249 (93%) .1 
    XPC Lys939Gln: AC + CC/AA (D) 36 (58%)/26 (42%) 156 (59%)/110 (41%) .1 
    XRCC1 Arg399Gln: AA/GG + GA (R) 5 (8%)/58 (92%) 40 (15%)/228 (85%) .2 
CharacteristicCases (n = 64)Controls (n = 271)P
ET/PV 35 (55%)/29 (45%) 158 (58%)/113 (42%)  
Age, y* 60.5 (16-81) 56 (13-89) .002 
Sex, male/female 27 (42%)/37 (58%) 95 (35%)/176 (65%) .4 
WBC* 10.8 (5-29) 8.7 (4.1-21) < .001 
    > 10 × 109/L 31 (55%) 109 (41%) .03 
    > 15 × 109/L 9 (16%) 24 (9%) .06 
Abnormal karyotype 4/29 (14%) 11/174 (6.5%) .5 
JAK2 mutation 38/50 (76%) 150/248 (60%) .03 
JAK2 genotype (rs12340895) 
    CC 24 (39%) 92 (35%) .8 
    CG 26 (42%) 119 (45%)  
    GG 12 (19%) 51 (19%)  
Exposure to cytoreductive agents 
    No exposure 1 (1.5%) 60 (22%) < .001 
    HU only 40 (62.5%) 164 (60.5%)  
    Other agents alone or in combination 23 (36%) 47 (17.5%)  
Detail of cytoreductive agents other than HU 
    32P alone or in combination 12 (19%) 42 (16%) .6 
    Alkylators alone or in combination 13 (20%) 12 (4%) < .001 
    HU plus alkylators and/or 3218 (28%) 34 (12.5%) .003 
Cumulated exposure to cytoreductive agents 
    HU cumulated dose (grams; n = 187)* 1956 (17-6048) 3223 (50-11882) < .001 
    Months on HU (n = 254)* 68 (1.2-213) 133 (2.8-291) < .001 
    Months on alkylating agents (n = 15)* 30 (5-202) 41 (1-164) NC 
    32P cumulated dose (mCi; n = 41)* 7.0 (3.5-15.2) 2.7 (2.3-10.8) NC 
DNA repair SNPs 
    ERCC2 (XPD) Lys751Gln: CC/AA + AC (R) 16 (25%)/47 (75%) 25 (9%)/245 (91%) < .001 
    ERCC5 Asp1104His: GC + CC/GG (D) 26 (41%)/37 (59%) 120 (46%)/143 (54%) .5 
    XPC Ala499Val: TT/CC + CT (R) 8 (14%)/50 (86%) 18 (7%)/249 (93%) .1 
    XPC Lys939Gln: AC + CC/AA (D) 36 (58%)/26 (42%) 156 (59%)/110 (41%) .1 
    XRCC1 Arg399Gln: AA/GG + GA (R) 5 (8%)/58 (92%) 40 (15%)/228 (85%) .2 

NC indicates not computable in the framework of a matched case-control design because of the insufficient number of patients with this feature.

*

Median (range).

Patients who received IFN or anagrelide as the only cytoreductive drugs were included in the “no exposure” group.

Results from the best inheritance model for each specific polymorphism. Genetic models: R indicates recessive; and D, dominant.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal