Table 3

Median (range) M-protein concentration and measures of free light chains year by year prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis

Blood draw prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis, yM-protein concentration* (g/dL)
Involved FLC-ratio
Involved-uninvolved FLC concentration, mg/dL
Involved FLC concentration, mg/dL
nMedian (range)nMedian (range)Median (range)Median (range)
By year       
    2 24 1.6 (0.4-3.7) 23 12.1 (2.3-138.4) 7.8 (0.6-61.9) 8.5 (0.9-62.3) 
    3 47 1.3 (0.5-3.1) 46 10.7 (1.7-285.7) 7.3 (0.6-118.2) 8.3 (1.0-119.0) 
    4 37 1.1 (0.5-3.9) 30 11.3 (1.8-1428.0) 5.1 (0.6-326.8) 6.1 (0.9-327.0) 
    5 26 1.2 (0.6-3.8) 25 12.5 (1.7-4042.6) 9.0 (0.6-322.9) 9.2 (1.5-323.0) 
    6 20 1.2 (0.6-3.6) 19 14.3 (1.7-907.5) 10.7 (0.6-205.8) 11.1 (1.5-206.0) 
    7 11 1.3 (0.7-3.5) 11 32.6 (1.8-677.9) 12.9 (0.9-180.7) 14.0 (2.0-181.0) 
    8 or more 10 0.9 (0.5-1.8) 19.4 (2.6-107.1) 12.0 (1.8-32.7) 13.0 (3.0-33.0) 
    Trend test  P = .025  P = .35  P = .30 
Blood draw prior to multiple myeloma diagnosis, yM-protein concentration* (g/dL)
Involved FLC-ratio
Involved-uninvolved FLC concentration, mg/dL
Involved FLC concentration, mg/dL
nMedian (range)nMedian (range)Median (range)Median (range)
By year       
    2 24 1.6 (0.4-3.7) 23 12.1 (2.3-138.4) 7.8 (0.6-61.9) 8.5 (0.9-62.3) 
    3 47 1.3 (0.5-3.1) 46 10.7 (1.7-285.7) 7.3 (0.6-118.2) 8.3 (1.0-119.0) 
    4 37 1.1 (0.5-3.9) 30 11.3 (1.8-1428.0) 5.1 (0.6-326.8) 6.1 (0.9-327.0) 
    5 26 1.2 (0.6-3.8) 25 12.5 (1.7-4042.6) 9.0 (0.6-322.9) 9.2 (1.5-323.0) 
    6 20 1.2 (0.6-3.6) 19 14.3 (1.7-907.5) 10.7 (0.6-205.8) 11.1 (1.5-206.0) 
    7 11 1.3 (0.7-3.5) 11 32.6 (1.8-677.9) 12.9 (0.9-180.7) 14.0 (2.0-181.0) 
    8 or more 10 0.9 (0.5-1.8) 19.4 (2.6-107.1) 12.0 (1.8-32.7) 13.0 (3.0-33.0) 
    Trend test  P = .025  P = .35  P = .30 
*

Individual sample results with an unquantifiable M-protein concentration were excluded from these analyses.

Subjects with a kappa-lambda FLC-ratio less than 0.26 and more than 1.65 were defined as having an “involved lambda” and “involved kappa” FLC, respectively. For persons with an involved lambda FLC, the involved FLC-ratio was computed as the ratio of lambda over kappa. For persons with an involved kappa FLC-ratio, it was computed by dividing kappa with lambda. Similarly, for persons with an involved lambda FLC, the involved-uninvolved FLC concentration was computed by subtracting kappa from lambda; and for persons with an involved kappa FLC, it was computed by subtracting lambda from kappa. All individuals with a kappa-lambda FLC-ratio within the normal range (reference: 0.26-1.65) were excluded from these analyses.

Because the involved-uninvolved FLC concentration (mg/dL) values were not normally distributed even after transformation, the estimated ptrend value (P = .27) was not considered to be reliable.