Table 1

Patient characteristics and transplantation conditions

CharacteristicAll patients (n = 236), n (%)MICA no mismatch (n = 216), n (%)MICA mismatch (n = 20), n (%)P
Age > 60 y 54 (23) 49 (23) 5 (25) .8 
Male sex 138 (58.5) 130 (60) 8 (40) .1 
CR at transplantation 102 (43) 92 (43) 10 (50) .6 
Pentostatin GVHD prophylaxis 61 (25.8) 54 (25) 4 (20) .8 
PB stem cell source 65 (27.5) 59 (27) 6 (30) .5 
Fludarabine regimen 213 (90) 196 (91) 17 (85) .4 
Ablative regimen 139 (59) 126 (58) 13 (65) .6 
ATG as part of conditioning regimen 227 (96) 209 (97) 18 (90) .17 
DPB1 2-mismatch 60 (25) 52 (24) 8 (40) .3 
HLA 10/10 match 172 (73) 164 (76) 8 (40) .001 
CharacteristicAll patients (n = 236), n (%)MICA no mismatch (n = 216), n (%)MICA mismatch (n = 20), n (%)P
Age > 60 y 54 (23) 49 (23) 5 (25) .8 
Male sex 138 (58.5) 130 (60) 8 (40) .1 
CR at transplantation 102 (43) 92 (43) 10 (50) .6 
Pentostatin GVHD prophylaxis 61 (25.8) 54 (25) 4 (20) .8 
PB stem cell source 65 (27.5) 59 (27) 6 (30) .5 
Fludarabine regimen 213 (90) 196 (91) 17 (85) .4 
Ablative regimen 139 (59) 126 (58) 13 (65) .6 
ATG as part of conditioning regimen 227 (96) 209 (97) 18 (90) .17 
DPB1 2-mismatch 60 (25) 52 (24) 8 (40) .3 
HLA 10/10 match 172 (73) 164 (76) 8 (40) .001 

Preparative regimens were fludarabine-containing (fludarabine/busulfan [n = 138], fludarabine/melphalan [n = 74], fludarabine/busulfan/clofarabine [n = 1]) and non–fludarabine-containing (busulfan/cyclophosphamide [n = 20], cytarabine/total body irradiation [n = 2], and total lymphocyte irradiation/antithymocyte globulin [ATG] [n = 1]). ATG was administered as part of conditioning regimen in 96% of the cases (n = 227). Tacrolimus-based standard GVHD prophylaxis was used,13  with additional pentostatin in 25% (n = 58) of patients.14  Day 11 methotrexate was omitted if pentostatin was administered. Supportive care treatments and blood products were administered as per institutional standards.13 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal