Table 1.

Comparison of Transduction Efficiencies (% G418-Resistant Progenitors) Obtained Using Supernatant Infection Alone, Supernatant With Fibronectin, Supernatant With Stromal Support or Cocultivation

No. of Experiments-150BFU-E CFU-GM CFU-GEMMLTC-IC
Sup on fibronectin  7  54 ± 10 52 ± 5  40 ± 7  44 ± 14  
Sup on fibroblast-151 3  23 ± 6  28 ± 3  15 ± 4 -152 
Sup alone  2  0  7 ± 0.5 3 ± 3  6 ± 1  
Cocultivation  3  90 ± 20 56 ± 11  43 ± 9  39 ± 12 
No. of Experiments-150BFU-E CFU-GM CFU-GEMMLTC-IC
Sup on fibronectin  7  54 ± 10 52 ± 5  40 ± 7  44 ± 14  
Sup on fibroblast-151 3  23 ± 6  28 ± 3  15 ± 4 -152 
Sup alone  2  0  7 ± 0.5 3 ± 3  6 ± 1  
Cocultivation  3  90 ± 20 56 ± 11  43 ± 9  39 ± 12 

Abbreviation: Sup, supernatant.

F0-150

All cells were incubated in cytokines for 2 days before 2 days of infection in the same virus-containing medium. For details, see text.

F0-151

An additional experiment using murine fibroblasts engineered to produce human IL-3, SF, and G-CSF16 yielded gene transfer efficiencies of 14%, 14%, and 10% to BFU-E, CFU-GM, and CFU-GEMM, respectively.

F0-152

Low LTC-IC recoveries precluded measurements of gene transfer efficiency.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal