Table 2.

Univariable analysis defines the prognostic values for CLL of currently used biomarkers, iNKT cells, and CD1d expression

Prognostic factorNo. of patients testedP*Ordering
Rai at diagnosis 60 .157 P>S 
ZAP-70 59 .097 P>S 
Chromosomal aberration score§ 63 .034 P>S 
FISH del 17p  .243 P>S 
Trisomy 12  .090 P>S 
FISH del 11q  .083 P>S 
iNKT cell counts 48 .050 P<S 
CD1d expression 64 .032 P>S 
IGHV unmutated status 58 .003 P>S 
iNKT cell frequency 50 .003 P<S 
CD38 65 .0001 P>S 
Prognostic factorNo. of patients testedP*Ordering
Rai at diagnosis 60 .157 P>S 
ZAP-70 59 .097 P>S 
Chromosomal aberration score§ 63 .034 P>S 
FISH del 17p  .243 P>S 
Trisomy 12  .090 P>S 
FISH del 11q  .083 P>S 
iNKT cell counts 48 .050 P<S 
CD1d expression 64 .032 P>S 
IGHV unmutated status 58 .003 P>S 
iNKT cell frequency 50 .003 P<S 
CD38 65 .0001 P>S 

The distribution of each prognostic factor in patients with stable disease (S) vs progressive disease (P) was compared by Wilcoxon tests.

FISH, fluorescent in situ hybridization.

*

P values < .05 indicate statistically significant difference between patients with progressive disease and those with stable disease.

P>S tested the hypothesis with prognostic factor values higher among patients with progressive disease than among patients with stable disease; P<S tested the hypothesis with prognostic factor values lower among patients with progressive disease than among patients with stable disease.

Each variable was evaluated as continuous.

§

Chromosomal aberration score was calculated as the sum of total chromosomal aberration numbers per patient.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal