Table 4.

Summary of clinical characteristics, best responses, and biomarker evaluation in RT patients

RT patientCLL biology and therapyRT biology and therapy
CLL FISHTP53 mutIGHVIGHV subsetCLL therapy prior to transformation and best response (DOR)Prior RT therapy before Pembro and response (DOR)% PD-1% PD-L1RT vs CLL cloneEBERBest response to PembroDuration of Pembro therapy
RS1 Normal — UM 4-39*01 PCR CR (2 y) RCHOP, RICE, RDHAP, Ibr PD to chemo, PR to Ibr (5 mo), then PD 52.3 17.4 Rel — CR 16 mo, ongoing 
RS2 del(17p) — UM 3-30*03 Ibr PR-L (1.5 y) None 45.2 3.6 Rel — PR 12 mo, ongoing 
RS3 del(13q) UM 4-39*01 Ibr PR (5 mo) RCHOP PR (3 mo), then PD 22.8 1.6 Rel — SD, skin lymphoma response 2 mo, off therapy 
RS4 Normal n/a 4-1*02  Untreated REPOCH, Ibr PD n/a n/a n/a n/a SD, nodal reduction 2 mo, off therapy 
RS5 del(13q) — 1-18*01  Untreated RCHOP PD n/a n/a n/a n/a PD 3 mo, off therapy 
RS6 del(13q) UM 4-61*01 Ibr SD (6 mo) None 47.2 30.4 n/a — PR 4 mo, off therapy 
RS7 del(17p) — UM 1-2*02  Untreated RCHOP,
auto-SCT 
CR (4.5 y), then PD n/a n/a n/a SD 5 mo, off therapy 
RS8 Normal — UM 3-11*01  Untreated RCHOP, RICE, auto-SCT, RDHAP CR (1 y), then PD 1.0 4.0 Rel — SD 3 mo, off therapy 
RS9 del(17p) — UM 3-21*01 Ibr CR (2 y) None 21.4 34.0 Rel — PMR 3 mo, ongoing 
RT patientCLL biology and therapyRT biology and therapy
CLL FISHTP53 mutIGHVIGHV subsetCLL therapy prior to transformation and best response (DOR)Prior RT therapy before Pembro and response (DOR)% PD-1% PD-L1RT vs CLL cloneEBERBest response to PembroDuration of Pembro therapy
RS1 Normal — UM 4-39*01 PCR CR (2 y) RCHOP, RICE, RDHAP, Ibr PD to chemo, PR to Ibr (5 mo), then PD 52.3 17.4 Rel — CR 16 mo, ongoing 
RS2 del(17p) — UM 3-30*03 Ibr PR-L (1.5 y) None 45.2 3.6 Rel — PR 12 mo, ongoing 
RS3 del(13q) UM 4-39*01 Ibr PR (5 mo) RCHOP PR (3 mo), then PD 22.8 1.6 Rel — SD, skin lymphoma response 2 mo, off therapy 
RS4 Normal n/a 4-1*02  Untreated REPOCH, Ibr PD n/a n/a n/a n/a SD, nodal reduction 2 mo, off therapy 
RS5 del(13q) — 1-18*01  Untreated RCHOP PD n/a n/a n/a n/a PD 3 mo, off therapy 
RS6 del(13q) UM 4-61*01 Ibr SD (6 mo) None 47.2 30.4 n/a — PR 4 mo, off therapy 
RS7 del(17p) — UM 1-2*02  Untreated RCHOP,
auto-SCT 
CR (4.5 y), then PD n/a n/a n/a SD 5 mo, off therapy 
RS8 Normal — UM 3-11*01  Untreated RCHOP, RICE, auto-SCT, RDHAP CR (1 y), then PD 1.0 4.0 Rel — SD 3 mo, off therapy 
RS9 del(17p) — UM 3-21*01 Ibr CR (2 y) None 21.4 34.0 Rel — PMR 3 mo, ongoing 

Percent PD-1 and PD-L1 expression were quantitatively analyzed by calculating positive-cell percentage of the corresponding antigens in all cells of tumor samples. All 6 RT patients (RS1, RS2, RS3, RS6, RS8, and RS9) tested, did not have copy number gain nor amplification in chromosome 9p24. The RT disease of RS6 had PR to single-agent pembrolizumab for 4 months before he came off therapy due to thrombocytopenia caused by CLL marrow progression. RS3, RS4, RS5, RS7, and RS8 came off therapy due to lack of sufficient durable responses or alternative therapy.

auto-SCT, autologous stem cell transplant; EBER, Epstein-Barr virus–encoded RNA; Ibr, ibrutinib; M, mutated IGHV; n/a, not available; PCR, pentostatin, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab; Pembro, pembrolizumab; PR-L, PR with lymphocytosis; RCHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; RDHAP, rituximab, cisplatin, cytarabine, and dexamethasone; Rel, clonally related between CLL and RT clones; REPOCH, rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone; RICE, rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide; TP53 mut, TP53 mutation; UM, unmutated IGHV.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal