Table 3

Diagnostic accuracy of different ELISA assays by manufacturer

AssayNo. studiesNo. patientsStatistical modelSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)Positive LR (95% CI)Negative LR (95% CI)
Polyspecific ELISA, low threshold 
 Pooled estimates 31* 8933* Unified 96.7 (89.7-99.0) 86.8 (82.0-90.5) 7.3 (5.4-10.0) 0.04 (0.01-0.12) 
 GTI19,20,28,41,46,47,50,54,61,68,74,75,79  13 3804 Unified 99.9 (90.9-100.0) 87.4 (79.2-92.7) 7.9 (4.7-13.4) 0.001 (<0.001-0.11) 
 Zymutest63,69,77  295 Fixed effects 99.5 (94.8-100.0) 77.6 (72.9-82.3) 4.1 (3.1-5.5) 0.05 (0.01-0.12) 
 Asserachrom39,45,46,49-51,53,59,60,63,64,71,75,78,79  15 2621 Unified 92.7 (73.6-98.3) 87.3 (79.9-92.3) 7.3 (4.6-11.7) 0.08 (0.02-0.34) 
 In-house assay16,43,48,52,79 § 2673 Unified 93.2 (76.3-98.3) 92.6 (90.1-94.0) 12.6 (9.7-16.3) 0.07 (0.02-0.28) 
Polyspecific ELISA, intermediate threshold 
 Pooled estimates* 5* 2334* Unified 98.6 (95.2-99.6) 94.8 (92.2-96.5) 18.8 (12.7-27.9) 0.01 (0.004-0.05) 
 GTI19,47,61,65  2646 Unified 97.4 (92.4-99.1) 95.9 (94.3-97.0) 23.6 (17.2-32.4) 0.03 (0.009-0.08) 
 Zymutest77  87 — 100.0 82.5 5.7 0.00 
 Asserachrom65  1291 — 99.6 93.6 15.6 0.01 
IgG-specific ELISA, low threshold 
 Pooled estimates* 12* 3116* Unified 98.3 (95.1-99.4) 85.4 (78.2-90.6) 6.7 (4.5-10.2) 0.02 (0.01-0.05) 
 GTI55,63,64,70  639 Unified 99.6 (22.7-100.0) 89.9 (86.2-92.6) 9.8 (7.2-13.4) 0.004 (<0.001-3.7) 
 Zymutest44,63,69,70,77  829 Unified 99.2 (86.4-100.0) 85.8 (77.1-91.5) 7.0 (4.3-11.4) 0.008 (<0.001-0.18) 
 Asserachrom66,71  160 Fixed effects 72.0 (68.4-75.5) 93.8 (90.3-97.4) 3.6 (2.04-5.6) 0.27 (0.10-0.72) 
 Technozym72  41 — 100.0 0.92 12.7 0.00 
 In-house assay19,20 § 2958 Unified 99.2 (96.4-99.8) 83.5 (71.5-91.0) 6.0 (3.4-10.7) 0.009 (0.002-0.04) 
IgG-specific ELISA, intermediate threshold 
 Pooled estimates* 4* 2545* Unified 91.2 (86.3-94.5) 93.5 (89.1-96.2) 14.1 (8.1-24.5) 0.09 (0.06-0.15) 
 Zymutest77  87 — 100.0 82.5 5.7 0.00 
 In-house assay19,20 § 4416 Unified 89.8 (82.7-94.2) 96.0 (94.5-97.1) 22.5 (16.3-31.2) 0.10 (0.06-0.18) 
AssayNo. studiesNo. patientsStatistical modelSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)Positive LR (95% CI)Negative LR (95% CI)
Polyspecific ELISA, low threshold 
 Pooled estimates 31* 8933* Unified 96.7 (89.7-99.0) 86.8 (82.0-90.5) 7.3 (5.4-10.0) 0.04 (0.01-0.12) 
 GTI19,20,28,41,46,47,50,54,61,68,74,75,79  13 3804 Unified 99.9 (90.9-100.0) 87.4 (79.2-92.7) 7.9 (4.7-13.4) 0.001 (<0.001-0.11) 
 Zymutest63,69,77  295 Fixed effects 99.5 (94.8-100.0) 77.6 (72.9-82.3) 4.1 (3.1-5.5) 0.05 (0.01-0.12) 
 Asserachrom39,45,46,49-51,53,59,60,63,64,71,75,78,79  15 2621 Unified 92.7 (73.6-98.3) 87.3 (79.9-92.3) 7.3 (4.6-11.7) 0.08 (0.02-0.34) 
 In-house assay16,43,48,52,79 § 2673 Unified 93.2 (76.3-98.3) 92.6 (90.1-94.0) 12.6 (9.7-16.3) 0.07 (0.02-0.28) 
Polyspecific ELISA, intermediate threshold 
 Pooled estimates* 5* 2334* Unified 98.6 (95.2-99.6) 94.8 (92.2-96.5) 18.8 (12.7-27.9) 0.01 (0.004-0.05) 
 GTI19,47,61,65  2646 Unified 97.4 (92.4-99.1) 95.9 (94.3-97.0) 23.6 (17.2-32.4) 0.03 (0.009-0.08) 
 Zymutest77  87 — 100.0 82.5 5.7 0.00 
 Asserachrom65  1291 — 99.6 93.6 15.6 0.01 
IgG-specific ELISA, low threshold 
 Pooled estimates* 12* 3116* Unified 98.3 (95.1-99.4) 85.4 (78.2-90.6) 6.7 (4.5-10.2) 0.02 (0.01-0.05) 
 GTI55,63,64,70  639 Unified 99.6 (22.7-100.0) 89.9 (86.2-92.6) 9.8 (7.2-13.4) 0.004 (<0.001-3.7) 
 Zymutest44,63,69,70,77  829 Unified 99.2 (86.4-100.0) 85.8 (77.1-91.5) 7.0 (4.3-11.4) 0.008 (<0.001-0.18) 
 Asserachrom66,71  160 Fixed effects 72.0 (68.4-75.5) 93.8 (90.3-97.4) 3.6 (2.04-5.6) 0.27 (0.10-0.72) 
 Technozym72  41 — 100.0 0.92 12.7 0.00 
 In-house assay19,20 § 2958 Unified 99.2 (96.4-99.8) 83.5 (71.5-91.0) 6.0 (3.4-10.7) 0.009 (0.002-0.04) 
IgG-specific ELISA, intermediate threshold 
 Pooled estimates* 4* 2545* Unified 91.2 (86.3-94.5) 93.5 (89.1-96.2) 14.1 (8.1-24.5) 0.09 (0.06-0.15) 
 Zymutest77  87 — 100.0 82.5 5.7 0.00 
 In-house assay19,20 § 4416 Unified 89.8 (82.7-94.2) 96.0 (94.5-97.1) 22.5 (16.3-31.2) 0.10 (0.06-0.18) 
*

Studies conducted in the same study population were included only once to maintain independency of observations.

Including technically identical Gen-Probe assay.

In tests with <4 studies available, summary estimates were calculated using a fixed-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method; to be interpreted with caution).

§

Application of pooled “in-house assay” data to individual tests must be done with caution because these tests are constructed differently (every assay must be evaluated individually).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal