Table 4

Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard models for either OS or PFS)

ParameterHR95% CIP
Multivariate analysis of OS (103 subjects, 6 deaths)    
 MTV (increments of 102 ml) 0.96 0.66-1.40 .833 
 TLG (increments of 1031.49 1.18-1.89 .001 
Multivariate analysis of PFS (103 subjects, 13 events)    
 Bulky disease (<10 cm vs ≥10 cm) 1.73 0.31-9.52 .526 
 MTV (increments of 102 mL) 1.03 0.80-1.33 .812 
 TLG (increments of 103 mL) 1.36 1.16-1.58 <.001 
ParameterHR95% CIP
Multivariate analysis of OS (103 subjects, 6 deaths)    
 MTV (increments of 102 ml) 0.96 0.66-1.40 .833 
 TLG (increments of 1031.49 1.18-1.89 .001 
Multivariate analysis of PFS (103 subjects, 13 events)    
 Bulky disease (<10 cm vs ≥10 cm) 1.73 0.31-9.52 .526 
 MTV (increments of 102 mL) 1.03 0.80-1.33 .812 
 TLG (increments of 103 mL) 1.36 1.16-1.58 <.001 

Each as a whole was statistically significant, and in both models, TLG resulted in a significantly longer survival time after controlling for mediastinal bulk and MTV in PFS and for MTV in OS.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal