Table 2

Correlations of tmTNF-α expression with clinical features of ALL

CharacteristicsCasesExpression (%) of tmTNF-α (mean ± SEM)P
Subtype   .9987 
 B-ALL 15 65.06 ± 9.351  
 T-ALL 16 69.08 ± 9.975  
Age (y)   .2976 
 >35 12 55.23 ± 12.57  
 ≤35 18 70.16 ± 7.89  
BM blasts   .9393 
 >Median 15 63.35 ± 10.12  
 ≤Median 15 62.27 ± 9.741  
White cell count (×10−3/mm3)   <.05 
 >30 14 81.31 ± 7.578  
 ≤30 17 51.69 ± 9.597  
Risk status*(cytogenetic abnormalities)   .5525 
 Adverse 10 55.8 ± 18.56  
 Others 20 72.7 ± 23.32  
Risk status*(exclude Ph+)   <.01 
 Standard risk 16 51.74 ± 10.07  
 Poor risk 10 91.04 ± 3.306  
Risk status*   .5958 
 Ph+ 55.8 ± 18.56  
 Ph− 25 65.87 ± 7.551  
Extramedullary infiltration   <.01 
 Yes 24 74.57 ± 6.748  
 No 32.51 ± 13.38  
CharacteristicsCasesExpression (%) of tmTNF-α (mean ± SEM)P
Subtype   .9987 
 B-ALL 15 65.06 ± 9.351  
 T-ALL 16 69.08 ± 9.975  
Age (y)   .2976 
 >35 12 55.23 ± 12.57  
 ≤35 18 70.16 ± 7.89  
BM blasts   .9393 
 >Median 15 63.35 ± 10.12  
 ≤Median 15 62.27 ± 9.741  
White cell count (×10−3/mm3)   <.05 
 >30 14 81.31 ± 7.578  
 ≤30 17 51.69 ± 9.597  
Risk status*(cytogenetic abnormalities)   .5525 
 Adverse 10 55.8 ± 18.56  
 Others 20 72.7 ± 23.32  
Risk status*(exclude Ph+)   <.01 
 Standard risk 16 51.74 ± 10.07  
 Poor risk 10 91.04 ± 3.306  
Risk status*   .5958 
 Ph+ 55.8 ± 18.56  
 Ph− 25 65.87 ± 7.551  
Extramedullary infiltration   <.01 
 Yes 24 74.57 ± 6.748  
 No 32.51 ± 13.38  

Differences between 2 groups were analyzed by the Student t test.

*

Risk status stratification is according to NCCN guidelines (2012).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal