Table 1

Induction consolidation and maintenance studies in myeloma

GroupInductionTransplant type: responseConsolidationMaintenanceReference
Medical Research Council CTd Single: CR in 50% No Thalidomide vs 0 4  
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute VRd Single in 28: PFS in 92% at 1 y No Not in transplanted patients 5  
European Myeloma Network Carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone Single: ≥VGPR in 60% Carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone No 6  
Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome Vd Single: ≥VGPR in 54% Lenalidomide ×2 Lenalidomide vs 0 7  
Program a Espanol de Tratamientos en Hematologica VTd Single: ≥CR in 46% No Interferon vs thalidomide vs bortezomib thalidomide 8  
Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases VTd Tandem: ≥VGPR in 89% VTd ×2 Dexamethasone 9  
Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and the German Multicenter Myeloma Group PAD Single (n = 210) and tandem (n = 142): CR or near-CR in 49% No PAD ×2 y 10  
European Myeloma Network VMP ×4 Single vs tandem* VRd ×2 vs 0 Lenalidomide 11  
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute VRd Single vs 0* No Lenalidomide 12  
International CRd Single vs CRd: PFS in 60% vs 38% at 3 y CRd in nontransplant arm Lenalidomide vs lenalidomide prednisone 3  
GroupInductionTransplant type: responseConsolidationMaintenanceReference
Medical Research Council CTd Single: CR in 50% No Thalidomide vs 0 4  
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute VRd Single in 28: PFS in 92% at 1 y No Not in transplanted patients 5  
European Myeloma Network Carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone Single: ≥VGPR in 60% Carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone No 6  
Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome Vd Single: ≥VGPR in 54% Lenalidomide ×2 Lenalidomide vs 0 7  
Program a Espanol de Tratamientos en Hematologica VTd Single: ≥CR in 46% No Interferon vs thalidomide vs bortezomib thalidomide 8  
Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases VTd Tandem: ≥VGPR in 89% VTd ×2 Dexamethasone 9  
Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group and the German Multicenter Myeloma Group PAD Single (n = 210) and tandem (n = 142): CR or near-CR in 49% No PAD ×2 y 10  
European Myeloma Network VMP ×4 Single vs tandem* VRd ×2 vs 0 Lenalidomide 11  
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute VRd Single vs 0* No Lenalidomide 12  
International CRd Single vs CRd: PFS in 60% vs 38% at 3 y CRd in nontransplant arm Lenalidomide vs lenalidomide prednisone 3  

CRd, cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; CTd, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone; PAD, bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone; Vd, bortezomib, dexamethasone.

*

Clinical trial in progress.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal