Table 1

Presenting clinical and laboratory features of 826 Mayo Clinic patients with ET vs PV vs PMF

VariablesET, n = 292PV, n = 267PMF, n = 267P
ET vs PVET vs PMFPV vs PMF
Age, median (range), y 55 (15-91) 64 (19-95) 63 (14-87) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Age ≥60 y, n (%) 123 (42.1) 157 (58.8) 163 (61) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Females, n (%) 173 (59.2) 137 (51.3) 102 (38.2) .06 <.0001 .002 
Hemoglobin, median (range), g/dL 13.9 (6.9-17.9) 18.4 (15.1-24.5) 10.6 (5.8-16.1) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Leukocytes, median (range), ×109/L 9.6 (2.8-53.4) 11.8 (3.8-171.6) 8.6 (0.8-146.6) <.0001 .1 <.0001 
Platelets, median (range), ×109/L 1000 (454-3460) 467 (37-1720) 253 (12-2466) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Risk stratification,*%       
 Low 37 25 17 
 Intermediate 40 32  
 Intermediate-1   22 
 Intermediate-2   33 
 High 23 43 28 
Leukocytes, ≥11 × 109/L, % 33.1 56.5 36.3 <.0001 .4 <.0001 
Platelets, >1000 × 109/L, % 52.4 7.1 2.2 <.0001 <.0001 .008 
Abnormal karyotype, “N” evaluable = 610, n (%) 16 (7.7) 26 (18.3) 87 (33.4) .003 <.0001 .001 
Palpable splenomegaly, % 23.6 37.3 72.6 .0005 <.0001 <.0001 
Microcirculatory symptoms, “N” evaluable = 510, n (%) 52 (17.8) 89 (40.8) NA <.0001 NA NA 
Mutational status, n (%)    NA .02 NA 
 JAK2 157 (53.8) 149 (55.8) 
 CALR 89 (30.5) 64 (24) 
 MPL 8 (2.7) 21 (7.9) 
 Triple negative 38 (13) 33 (12.3) 
VariablesET, n = 292PV, n = 267PMF, n = 267P
ET vs PVET vs PMFPV vs PMF
Age, median (range), y 55 (15-91) 64 (19-95) 63 (14-87) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Age ≥60 y, n (%) 123 (42.1) 157 (58.8) 163 (61) <.0001 <.0001 .6 
Females, n (%) 173 (59.2) 137 (51.3) 102 (38.2) .06 <.0001 .002 
Hemoglobin, median (range), g/dL 13.9 (6.9-17.9) 18.4 (15.1-24.5) 10.6 (5.8-16.1) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Leukocytes, median (range), ×109/L 9.6 (2.8-53.4) 11.8 (3.8-171.6) 8.6 (0.8-146.6) <.0001 .1 <.0001 
Platelets, median (range), ×109/L 1000 (454-3460) 467 (37-1720) 253 (12-2466) <.0001 <.0001 <.0001 
Risk stratification,*%       
 Low 37 25 17 
 Intermediate 40 32  
 Intermediate-1   22 
 Intermediate-2   33 
 High 23 43 28 
Leukocytes, ≥11 × 109/L, % 33.1 56.5 36.3 <.0001 .4 <.0001 
Platelets, >1000 × 109/L, % 52.4 7.1 2.2 <.0001 <.0001 .008 
Abnormal karyotype, “N” evaluable = 610, n (%) 16 (7.7) 26 (18.3) 87 (33.4) .003 <.0001 .001 
Palpable splenomegaly, % 23.6 37.3 72.6 .0005 <.0001 <.0001 
Microcirculatory symptoms, “N” evaluable = 510, n (%) 52 (17.8) 89 (40.8) NA <.0001 NA NA 
Mutational status, n (%)    NA .02 NA 
 JAK2 157 (53.8) 149 (55.8) 
 CALR 89 (30.5) 64 (24) 
 MPL 8 (2.7) 21 (7.9) 
 Triple negative 38 (13) 33 (12.3) 

NA, not available.

*

Risk stratification in PMF was according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System plus; in ET, according to the International Prognostic Scoring System; and in PV, according to the International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment criteria. References for these prognostic criteria are included in the main text.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal