Table 1

Distribution of histopathologic variant patterns in NLPHL cases

Minor component
Major component*ABCDEFTotal
294 (71%) — 10 (2%) 24 (6%) 1 (0%) 3 (1%) 332 (80%) 
2 (0%) 12 (3%) 1 (0%) 3 (1%) — — 18 (4%) 
5 (1%) 1 (0%) 15 (4%) 3 (1%) 3 (1%) — 27 (7%) 
7 (2%) 1 (0%) — 3 (1%) 7 (2%) 3 (1%) 21 (5%) 
— — 1 (0%) 5 (1%) — 1 (0%) 7 (2%) 
— — 1 (0%) — — 7 (2%) 8 (2%) 
Total 308 (75%) 14 (3%) 28 (7%) 38 (9%) 11 (3%) 14 (3%) 413 (100%) 
Minor component
Major component*ABCDEFTotal
294 (71%) — 10 (2%) 24 (6%) 1 (0%) 3 (1%) 332 (80%) 
2 (0%) 12 (3%) 1 (0%) 3 (1%) — — 18 (4%) 
5 (1%) 1 (0%) 15 (4%) 3 (1%) 3 (1%) — 27 (7%) 
7 (2%) 1 (0%) — 3 (1%) 7 (2%) 3 (1%) 21 (5%) 
— — 1 (0%) 5 (1%) — 1 (0%) 7 (2%) 
— — 1 (0%) — — 7 (2%) 8 (2%) 
Total 308 (75%) 14 (3%) 28 (7%) 38 (9%) 11 (3%) 14 (3%) 413 (100%) 

Cases with a single growth pattern are bolded.

Pattern A: “Classic” nodular pattern, B cell–rich; pattern B: serpiginous/interconnected nodular pattern; pattern C: nodular with prominent extranodular LP cells; pattern D: nodular with T cell–rich background; pattern E: diffuse pattern (T cell/histiocyte–rich large B-cell lymphoma–like); pattern F: diffuse, “moth-eaten,” with B cell–rich background

*

Major component: Dominating histopathologic growth (found in >50% of lymphoma tissue).

Minor component: Histopathologic growth pattern observed in <50% of the lymphoma tissue.

Ten cases with tumor cell–rich histology are excluded.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal