Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the 818 study patients

CharacteristicMaintenance (n = 408)No maintenance (n = 410)
Age, y   
    Median 65 64 
    Range 34-89 31-86 
Sex   
    Male 245 (60.0) 254 (62.0) 
    Female 163 (40.0) 156 (38.0) 
International Staging System at initial randomization   
    I 88 (21.6) 90 (22.0) 
    II 155 (38.0) 143 (34.9) 
    III 124 (30.4) 130 (31.7) 
    Missing data 41 (10.0) 47 (11.5) 
Type of myeloma   
    IgG 240 (58.8) 245 (59.8) 
    IgA 106 (26.0) 91 (22.2) 
    IgM 1 (0.2) 3 (0.7) 
    No paraprotein 5 (1.2) 9 (2.2) 
    IgD 12 (2.9) 6 (1.5) 
    Light chain 42 (10.3) 51 (12.4) 
    Missing data 2 (0.5) 5 (1.2) 
Induction treatment pathway   
    Intensive 245 (60.0) 247 (60.2) 
    Nonintensive 163 (40.0) 163 (39.8) 
Time between initial and maintenance randomization, mo   
    Median 8.3 8.2 
    Range 3.5-21.7 3.9-18.6 
Randomized induction chemotherapy regimen   
    CVAD 121 (29.7) 120 (29.3) 
    CTD 124 (30.4) 127 (31.0) 
    MP 79 (19.4) 82 (20.0) 
    CTDa 84 (20.6) 81 (19.8) 
Response at maintenance randomization*   
    Complete response 158 (38.7) 139 (33.9) 
    Very good partial response 65 (15.9) 79 (19.3) 
    Partial response 125 (30.6) 119 (29.0) 
    Minimal response 17 (4.2) 23 (5.6) 
    No change 10 (2.5) 24 (5.9) 
    Progressive disease 9 (2.2) 14 (3.4) 
    Missing data 24 (5.9) 12 (2.9) 
Interphase cytogenetic abnormalities by iFISH, n/N (%)   
    Adverse 99/225 (44) 98/227 (43) 
        gain(1q) 73/191 (38) 75/199 (38) 
        del(1p32) 12/117 (10) 12/111 (11) 
        t(4;14) 26/221 (12) 20/225 (9) 
        t(14;16) 4/219 (2) 7/225 (3) 
        t(14;20) 1/217 (0.5) 3/223 (1) 
        del(17p) 17/215 (8) 11/211 (5) 
    Favorable 126/225 (56) 129/227 (57) 
CharacteristicMaintenance (n = 408)No maintenance (n = 410)
Age, y   
    Median 65 64 
    Range 34-89 31-86 
Sex   
    Male 245 (60.0) 254 (62.0) 
    Female 163 (40.0) 156 (38.0) 
International Staging System at initial randomization   
    I 88 (21.6) 90 (22.0) 
    II 155 (38.0) 143 (34.9) 
    III 124 (30.4) 130 (31.7) 
    Missing data 41 (10.0) 47 (11.5) 
Type of myeloma   
    IgG 240 (58.8) 245 (59.8) 
    IgA 106 (26.0) 91 (22.2) 
    IgM 1 (0.2) 3 (0.7) 
    No paraprotein 5 (1.2) 9 (2.2) 
    IgD 12 (2.9) 6 (1.5) 
    Light chain 42 (10.3) 51 (12.4) 
    Missing data 2 (0.5) 5 (1.2) 
Induction treatment pathway   
    Intensive 245 (60.0) 247 (60.2) 
    Nonintensive 163 (40.0) 163 (39.8) 
Time between initial and maintenance randomization, mo   
    Median 8.3 8.2 
    Range 3.5-21.7 3.9-18.6 
Randomized induction chemotherapy regimen   
    CVAD 121 (29.7) 120 (29.3) 
    CTD 124 (30.4) 127 (31.0) 
    MP 79 (19.4) 82 (20.0) 
    CTDa 84 (20.6) 81 (19.8) 
Response at maintenance randomization*   
    Complete response 158 (38.7) 139 (33.9) 
    Very good partial response 65 (15.9) 79 (19.3) 
    Partial response 125 (30.6) 119 (29.0) 
    Minimal response 17 (4.2) 23 (5.6) 
    No change 10 (2.5) 24 (5.9) 
    Progressive disease 9 (2.2) 14 (3.4) 
    Missing data 24 (5.9) 12 (2.9) 
Interphase cytogenetic abnormalities by iFISH, n/N (%)   
    Adverse 99/225 (44) 98/227 (43) 
        gain(1q) 73/191 (38) 75/199 (38) 
        del(1p32) 12/117 (10) 12/111 (11) 
        t(4;14) 26/221 (12) 20/225 (9) 
        t(14;16) 4/219 (2) 7/225 (3) 
        t(14;20) 1/217 (0.5) 3/223 (1) 
        del(17p) 17/215 (8) 11/211 (5) 
    Favorable 126/225 (56) 129/227 (57) 

Data are n (%), unless stated otherwise.

CTD indicates cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone; CTDa, attenuated CTD; CVAD, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, adriamycin, and dexamethasone; iFISH, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization; Ig, immunoglobulin; and MP, melphalan and prednisolone.

*

After induction/high-dose therapy and therefore preceding maintenance randomization.

Multiple abnormalities can be present in the same patient.

Intensive pathway only.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal