Table 1

Effects of soluble Glu-Pg and Lys-Pg on the binding of anti-Pg mAbs to immobilized Glu-Pg

Competitor, absorbance OD 405
mAbBufferGlu-PgLys-Pg
20 0.76 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.05 0.78 ± 0.05 
109 0.83 ± 0.06 0.82 ± 0.02 0.75 ± 0.06 
49 0.57 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.02 
51 0.68 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.06 
53 0.69 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.01 
116 0.55 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.05 0.52 ± 0.02 
Buffer 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 
Competitor, absorbance OD 405
mAbBufferGlu-PgLys-Pg
20 0.76 ± 0.02 0.78 ± 0.05 0.78 ± 0.05 
109 0.83 ± 0.06 0.82 ± 0.02 0.75 ± 0.06 
49 0.57 ± 0.04 0.54 ± 0.01 0.66 ± 0.02 
51 0.68 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.03 0.73 ± 0.06 
53 0.69 ± 0.05 0.63 ± 0.03 0.69 ± 0.01 
116 0.55 ± 0.03 0.50 ± 0.05 0.52 ± 0.02 
Buffer 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 0.13 ± 0.01 

Binding of anti-Pg mAbs (180nM) to immobilized Glu-Pg was determined in the presence of either buffer, soluble Glu-Pg (1μM), or soluble Lys-Pg (1μM) as described in “ELISA for Glu-Pg.” Results are mean ± SEM; n = 3 for each experimental group.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal