Table 4

Allelic frequency of ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 in patients and controls

nΔCFHR1-CFHR3OR (95% CI)Homozygotes ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 observed vs expectedHardly-Weinberg equilibrium
Controls      
    Aged 0-30 y 135 24.1 NS 7 vs 8 NS 
    Aged 30-60 y 43 25.58 NS 2 vs 3 NS 
    Aged older than 60 y 92 24.72 NS 6 vs 6 NS 
    Totals 269 24.53 NS 15 vs 16 NS 
AMD patients 141 9,6 0.29 (0.181-0.475)* 2 vs 1 NS 
aHUS patients 137 21.12 NS 14 vs 6 0.00015 
MPGN2 patients 11 18 NS 0 vs 0 NS 
nΔCFHR1-CFHR3OR (95% CI)Homozygotes ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 observed vs expectedHardly-Weinberg equilibrium
Controls      
    Aged 0-30 y 135 24.1 NS 7 vs 8 NS 
    Aged 30-60 y 43 25.58 NS 2 vs 3 NS 
    Aged older than 60 y 92 24.72 NS 6 vs 6 NS 
    Totals 269 24.53 NS 15 vs 16 NS 
AMD patients 141 9,6 0.29 (0.181-0.475)* 2 vs 1 NS 
aHUS patients 137 21.12 NS 14 vs 6 0.00015 
MPGN2 patients 11 18 NS 0 vs 0 NS 

NS indicates not significant.

*

P < .001.

The ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 allele frequency is not increased in aHUS compared with controls (21.12 vs 24.53).

The frequency of ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 homozygotes in aHUS is significantly higher than that expected from the ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 allele frequency. There is also an increase in the frequency of ΔCFHR1-CFHR3 homozygotes in aHUS compared with controls (14 of 137 compared with 15 of 269), which does not reach statistical significance probably because of the size of our cohorts.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal