Table 2

Univariate and multivariate models using overall survival for 40 patients with concurrent BCL2 and MYC translocations treated with curative intent

VariableUnivariate
Multivariate
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
BCLU vs DLBCL 5.73 2.49-13.2 < .001 4.04 1.40-11.6 .009 
BM+ vs BM 3.27 1.50-7.33 .004 1.98 0.79-5.03 .150 
BCL2+ vs BCL2 2.86 0.791-10.3 .110 — — — 
IG/MYC vs non-IG/MYC 3.42 1.62-7.22 .001 1.47 0.55-3.88 .441 
IPI risk group, 2-3 vs 0-1 1.64 0.747-3.58 .220 1.45 0.53-3.95 .470 
IPI risk group, 4-5 vs 0-1 5.12 1.84-14.31 .002 3.25 0.85-12.4 .084 
VariableUnivariate
Multivariate
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
BCLU vs DLBCL 5.73 2.49-13.2 < .001 4.04 1.40-11.6 .009 
BM+ vs BM 3.27 1.50-7.33 .004 1.98 0.79-5.03 .150 
BCL2+ vs BCL2 2.86 0.791-10.3 .110 — — — 
IG/MYC vs non-IG/MYC 3.42 1.62-7.22 .001 1.47 0.55-3.88 .441 
IPI risk group, 2-3 vs 0-1 1.64 0.747-3.58 .220 1.45 0.53-3.95 .470 
IPI risk group, 4-5 vs 0-1 5.12 1.84-14.31 .002 3.25 0.85-12.4 .084 

HR indicates hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; BCLU, B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between Burkitt lymphoma and DLBCL; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; BM, bone marrow involvement; BCL2, BCL2 protein expression (clone 124); —, not applicable; IG, immunoglobulin; and IPI, International Prognostic Index.