Statistical comparison of survival data from Table 6
Comparison . | EFS hazard ratio(95% CI) . | EFS P . | CS hazard ratio(95% CI) . | OS P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITD−; NPMc− vs NPMc+ | 0.39 (0.27-1.00) | .051 | 0.4 (0.25-1.14) | .106 |
ITD+; NPMc− vs NPMc+ | 0.78 (0.35-1.77) | .568 | 0.9 (0.39-2.13) | .824 |
NPMc−; ITD− vs ITD+ | 1.72 (1.22-3.10) | .005 | 1.71 (1.17-3.12) | .01 |
NPMc+; ITD− vs ITD+ | 3.1 (0.93-13.3) | .063 | 4.23 (1.24-21.4) | .016 |
Comparison . | EFS hazard ratio(95% CI) . | EFS P . | CS hazard ratio(95% CI) . | OS P . |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITD−; NPMc− vs NPMc+ | 0.39 (0.27-1.00) | .051 | 0.4 (0.25-1.14) | .106 |
ITD+; NPMc− vs NPMc+ | 0.78 (0.35-1.77) | .568 | 0.9 (0.39-2.13) | .824 |
NPMc−; ITD− vs ITD+ | 1.72 (1.22-3.10) | .005 | 1.71 (1.17-3.12) | .01 |
NPMc+; ITD− vs ITD+ | 3.1 (0.93-13.3) | .063 | 4.23 (1.24-21.4) | .016 |
EFS indicates event-free survival; OS, overall survival; and CI, confidence interval.