Table 1

Nucleolar disorganization in skin fibroblasts from DBA patients

No. of cells analyzedNo. of nucleoli per cellSurface of nucleoli per cell, μm2Average fluorescence in nucleoli for ITS1, gray level per pixelAverage fluorescence in nucleoli for U3, gray level per pixel
Control 568 3.3 ± 1.2 18.0 ± 4.9 558 ± 136 818 ± 227 
MUTS-A 182 2.7 ± 1.1 19.7 ± 7.9 627 ± 153 977 ± 282 
MUTS-B 168 3.0 ± 1.2 20.6 ± 6.5 641 ± 169 783 ± 232 
NOTS-A 91 2.6 ± 1.1 29.4 ± 8.2 638 ± 160 711 ± 202 
No. of cells analyzedNo. of nucleoli per cellSurface of nucleoli per cell, μm2Average fluorescence in nucleoli for ITS1, gray level per pixelAverage fluorescence in nucleoli for U3, gray level per pixel
Control 568 3.3 ± 1.2 18.0 ± 4.9 558 ± 136 818 ± 227 
MUTS-A 182 2.7 ± 1.1 19.7 ± 7.9 627 ± 153 977 ± 282 
MUTS-B 168 3.0 ± 1.2 20.6 ± 6.5 641 ± 169 783 ± 232 
NOTS-A 91 2.6 ± 1.1 29.4 ± 8.2 638 ± 160 711 ± 202 

Semiquantitative analysis of FISH labeling was performed on randomly taken images (see “Material and methods”). Comparison of any measure in DBA cells relative to the corresponding control with Student t test shows a very significant difference (P < .01). Data shown as mean ± standard deviation.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal