Table 3

Comparison between GRAAPH-2003 and LALA-94 studies

Present GRAAPH-2003LALA-94P
No. patients 45 198  
Hematologic CR, no./no. patients tested (%) 
    All patients 43/45 (96) 140/198 (71) <.001 
    Chemoresistant patients* 24/25 (96) 63/105 (60) <.001 
Allogeneic transplantation rate, no./no. patients tested (%) 
    All CR patients 22/43 (51) 62/140 (44) .49 
    CR patients with a donor 22/22 (100) 62/73 (85) .06 
Cumulative incidence of relapse: 18-mo estimates, % (95% CI) 30 (15-57) 49 (40-59) .02 
DFS: 18-mo estimates, % (95% CI) 51 (29-69) 31 (24-39) .02 
Overall survival: 18-mo estimates, % (95% CI) 65 (43-81) 39 (32-46) .05 
Present GRAAPH-2003LALA-94P
No. patients 45 198  
Hematologic CR, no./no. patients tested (%) 
    All patients 43/45 (96) 140/198 (71) <.001 
    Chemoresistant patients* 24/25 (96) 63/105 (60) <.001 
Allogeneic transplantation rate, no./no. patients tested (%) 
    All CR patients 22/43 (51) 62/140 (44) .49 
    CR patients with a donor 22/22 (100) 62/73 (85) .06 
Cumulative incidence of relapse: 18-mo estimates, % (95% CI) 30 (15-57) 49 (40-59) .02 
DFS: 18-mo estimates, % (95% CI) 51 (29-69) 31 (24-39) .02 
Overall survival: 18-mo estimates, % (95% CI) 65 (43-81) 39 (32-46) .05 

CI indicates confidence interval.

*

Considering that early treatments were different in both studies (no prephase, no L-asparaginase, different anthracycline types and dosages in the LALA-94 trial).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal