Table 1.

Patient characteristics and estimated outcomes





Patients randomized for consolidation

Eligible patients
Patients not randomized for consolidation
MOPP/ABV ×8
ABVPP ×8
MOPP/ABV + RT
ABVPP ×6 + RT
Patients' characteristics       
    No. patients   533   115   92   116   114   96  
    Men, %   66   57   73   68   68   67  
    Age, median, y   32   36   32   32   32   32  
    Age at least 45, %   23   40   21   16   17   22  
    Stage IIIB, %   40   25   52   41   39   46  
    Stage 4, %   60   75   48   59   61   54  
    Extranodal sites at least 2, %   27   62   21   22   25   23  
    Bone marrow involvement, %   20   33   12   16   20   18  
    ECOG performance status at least 2, %   12   22   8   10   11   11  
    Hemoglobin level less than 10.5 g/L, %   29   48   24   34   21   22  
    Albumin level less than 40 g/L, %   23   78   20   30   22   22  
    WBC at least 15 G/L, %   25   31   21   25   19   27  
    Lymphocyte count less than 0.6 G/L or less than 8% of WBC   13   23   8   16   12   8  
    IPS 0 to 2, %   39   23   41   40   48   40  
    IPS 3 or higher, %   61   77   59   60   42   60  
Additional treatment for refractory and relapsing disease, no. patients       
    MINE, ASCT   64   33   6   13   6   6  
    Other CT, ASCT   26   7   3   8   3   5  
    CT without ASCT   46   20   6   9   4   7  
    CT and tandem ASCT   11   5   2   1   —   3  
    HDCT allogeneic BMT   3   1   —   1   —   1  
    RT alone   3   1   —   1   —   1  
Outcomes, % (95% confidence interval)       
    CR rate   —   —   91   99   95   91  
10-year DFS*  74 (69-78)   59 (39-79)   76 (67-86)   70 (61-78)   79 (69-88)   76 (67-85)  
10-year event-free survival  61 (57-66)   24 (16-32)   71 (62-81)   67 (60-77)   77 (68-86)   69 (59-78)  
10-year OS§
 
75 (71-79)
 
50 (41-60)
 
78 (68-85)
 
90 (85-96)
 
82 (74-90)
 
77 (68-85)
 




Patients randomized for consolidation

Eligible patients
Patients not randomized for consolidation
MOPP/ABV ×8
ABVPP ×8
MOPP/ABV + RT
ABVPP ×6 + RT
Patients' characteristics       
    No. patients   533   115   92   116   114   96  
    Men, %   66   57   73   68   68   67  
    Age, median, y   32   36   32   32   32   32  
    Age at least 45, %   23   40   21   16   17   22  
    Stage IIIB, %   40   25   52   41   39   46  
    Stage 4, %   60   75   48   59   61   54  
    Extranodal sites at least 2, %   27   62   21   22   25   23  
    Bone marrow involvement, %   20   33   12   16   20   18  
    ECOG performance status at least 2, %   12   22   8   10   11   11  
    Hemoglobin level less than 10.5 g/L, %   29   48   24   34   21   22  
    Albumin level less than 40 g/L, %   23   78   20   30   22   22  
    WBC at least 15 G/L, %   25   31   21   25   19   27  
    Lymphocyte count less than 0.6 G/L or less than 8% of WBC   13   23   8   16   12   8  
    IPS 0 to 2, %   39   23   41   40   48   40  
    IPS 3 or higher, %   61   77   59   60   42   60  
Additional treatment for refractory and relapsing disease, no. patients       
    MINE, ASCT   64   33   6   13   6   6  
    Other CT, ASCT   26   7   3   8   3   5  
    CT without ASCT   46   20   6   9   4   7  
    CT and tandem ASCT   11   5   2   1   —   3  
    HDCT allogeneic BMT   3   1   —   1   —   1  
    RT alone   3   1   —   1   —   1  
Outcomes, % (95% confidence interval)       
    CR rate   —   —   91   99   95   91  
10-year DFS*  74 (69-78)   59 (39-79)   76 (67-86)   70 (61-78)   79 (69-88)   76 (67-85)  
10-year event-free survival  61 (57-66)   24 (16-32)   71 (62-81)   67 (60-77)   77 (68-86)   69 (59-78)  
10-year OS§
 
75 (71-79)
 
50 (41-60)
 
78 (68-85)
 
90 (85-96)
 
82 (74-90)
 
77 (68-85)
 

ECOG indicates Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IPS, International Prognostic Score; MINE, salvage therapy with mitoguazone, ifosfamide, navelbine, and etoposide; ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; HDCT, high-dose chemotherapy; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; CT, chemotherapy; and RT, radiotherapy.

*

Three hundred ninety-four patients in CR were analyzed.

P = .09 for the comparison of the 4 treatment arms.

P = .23 for the comparison of the 4 treatment arms.

§

P = .03 for the comparison of the 4 treatment arms.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal