Table 4.

Hazard ratio and 1- to 3-year DFS analysis at 3 PML-RARα NQ cutoff levels of samples after consolidation therapy in 53 INT0129 cases

NQ cutoffRelapses/patientsHR4-150,4-151P4-151DFS, %
1 y2 y3 y
Greater than 10−5 6/9 4.1 .008 56 44 33 
Less than 10−5 16/44   86 72 65 
Greater than 10−7/10−8 8/13 2.4 .074 62 54 46 
Less than 10−7/10−8 14/40   88 72 63 
Greater than 10−10 11/21 1.7 .244 67 62 52 
Negative 11/32   91 70 64 
NQ cutoffRelapses/patientsHR4-150,4-151P4-151DFS, %
1 y2 y3 y
Greater than 10−5 6/9 4.1 .008 56 44 33 
Less than 10−5 16/44   86 72 65 
Greater than 10−7/10−8 8/13 2.4 .074 62 54 46 
Less than 10−7/10−8 14/40   88 72 63 
Greater than 10−10 11/21 1.7 .244 67 62 52 
Negative 11/32   91 70 64 

Cases with NQs higher than the cutoff level are defined as poor-risk cases as compared with good-risk cases, those with NQs below the cutoff level. Percentages indicate DFS of the good-risk versus bad-risk categories at each level estimated for up to 3 years of follow-up. (Figure 3 shows plot of < 10−5versus > 10−5 cutoff level.) HR indicates hazard ratio.

F4-150

The hazard ratio indicates the relative risk of relapse in poor-risk versus good-risk cases calculated at 3 selected cutoff levels.

F4-151

The HRs and P's are adjusted for induction treatment, PML-RARα type, and pretreatment WBC count at 2000/μL cutoff.

The median GAPDH copy number for PML-RARα relapse cases was 4.3 × 106, higher than the median of 3.9 × 106 for all cases after consolidation therapy.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal