Table 2.

Trials evaluating therapy deescalation in interim PET-negative patients

TrialNClinical stageMedian age (range), yInitial therapySubsequent therapy for PET− patientsCMR definition% PET−Median follow-up, moPFS for PET− patients, % (y)OS for PET− patients, % (y)
United Kingdom RATHL23  1214 IIB-IV or IIA unfavorable 32 (18-79) ABVD ×2 Experimental: AVD ×4 DS 1-3 84 41 84.4 (3) 98.7 (3) 
Control: ABVD ×4 85.7 (3) 98.4 (3) 
Israeli H227  185 IIB-IV, IPS ≥ 3 30 (18-60) EB ×2 Experimental: ABVD ×4 DS 1-3 80 55 81.5 (5) 96.8 (5) 
Control: none  
AHL 2011 LYSA28  823 IIB-IV 30 (16-60) EB ×2 Experimental: ABVD ×4 DS 1-3 88 16 91.6 (2) NR 
Control: EB ×4 94.0 (2) NR 
GHSG HD1825  2101 IIB-IV 31 (23-44) EB ×2 Experimental: EB ×2 DS 1-2 52 66 92.2 (5) 97.7 (5) 
Control: EB ×4-6 90.8 (5) 95.4 (5) 
TrialNClinical stageMedian age (range), yInitial therapySubsequent therapy for PET− patientsCMR definition% PET−Median follow-up, moPFS for PET− patients, % (y)OS for PET− patients, % (y)
United Kingdom RATHL23  1214 IIB-IV or IIA unfavorable 32 (18-79) ABVD ×2 Experimental: AVD ×4 DS 1-3 84 41 84.4 (3) 98.7 (3) 
Control: ABVD ×4 85.7 (3) 98.4 (3) 
Israeli H227  185 IIB-IV, IPS ≥ 3 30 (18-60) EB ×2 Experimental: ABVD ×4 DS 1-3 80 55 81.5 (5) 96.8 (5) 
Control: none  
AHL 2011 LYSA28  823 IIB-IV 30 (16-60) EB ×2 Experimental: ABVD ×4 DS 1-3 88 16 91.6 (2) NR 
Control: EB ×4 94.0 (2) NR 
GHSG HD1825  2101 IIB-IV 31 (23-44) EB ×2 Experimental: EB ×2 DS 1-2 52 66 92.2 (5) 97.7 (5) 
Control: EB ×4-6 90.8 (5) 95.4 (5) 

CMR, complete metabolic response; DS, Deauville score; EB, escBEACOPP; N, number of patients; NR, not reported.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal