Table 1.

Comparison of reported efficacy of second-line treatments with regard to platelet count, bleeding, HRQoL, and fatigue

Platelet count*BleedingHRQoLFatigue
Splenectomy Early response: 66-92%28  No studies No improvement in ITP-PAQ16  No studies 
Durable response: 60-70%29  Lower ITP-PAQ scores as compared with those without splenectomy34  
 
Rituximab Platelet counts >50 × 109/L 6 mo postinfusion: 40-60%38  No difference (9.2% vs 5.2%) compared with non-rituximab treatment or placebo37  No improvement as measured by change in ITP-PAQ or SF-3616,39  Possible increase with 22% of patients receiving rituximab reporting fatigue (8% on placebo)39  
Durable response: 21-26% 5 y after infusion38  
Romiplostim     
Adult trials Platelet count ≥50 × 109/L during ≥6 of the last 8 wk of treatment: 38% romiplostim vs 0% placebo11  No difference compared with non-romiplostim treatment or placebo11  Improvement in symptoms, activity, psychological health, and overall HRQoL as measured with the ITP-PAQ and EQ-5D No improvement meeting MID measured by ITP-PAQ16  
Platelet count ≥50 × 109/L: 71-92% romiplostim vs 0-51% placebo or non-romiplostim treatment46     
Long-term response (≥5 y): maintained by all patients for a median of 92% of study visits on stable doses24     
Pediatric trials Platelet count >50 × 109/L for 2 consecutive weeks: 88% romiplostim vs 0% placebo47  No difference compared with non-romiplostim treatment or placebo11  Reduced parental burden17   
Platelet counts >50 × 109/L were maintained for a median of 7 wk vs 0 wk for the placebo47     
Platelet count >50 × 109/L for ≥6 of 8 wk: 52% romiplostim vs 10% placebo12     
Long-term response (≥4 y): continued response on a tapering dose of romiplostim48     
Eltrombopag     
Adult trials Platelet count >50 × 109/L on day 43: 59% eltrombopag vs 16% placebo18  Decreased bleeding from baseline shown across trials in adults and children19,20  Improvement from baseline in physical, emotional, and mental function, as measured by SF-36v2 and FACT-thrombocytopenia18  Improvement in vitality on SF-36v2 compared with placebo27  
 Platelet count >50 × 109/L at least once; 79% eltrombopag vs 28% placebo49    Fatigue was reported as an adverse effect in 15% of patients in the EXTEND trial27  
 Long-term response (≥3 y): 62% platelet count >50 × 109/L in >50% of study assessments27     
Pediatric trials Platelet count >50 × 109/L: 62-75% eltrombopag vs 21-32% placebo19,21  Decreased bleeding from baseline shown across trials in adults and children19,20  No improvement in HRQoL by Kids’ ITP Tool scores21  Improvement in vitality on SF-36v2 compared with placebo27  
    Fatigue was reported as an adverse effect in 15% of patients in the EXTEND trial27  
 
Dapsone 40-62%45  No studies No studies No studies 
 
Mycophenolate mofetil 52-69%41  No studies No studies No studies 
 
Sirolimus 25-58%50,51  No studies No studies No studies 
Platelet count*BleedingHRQoLFatigue
Splenectomy Early response: 66-92%28  No studies No improvement in ITP-PAQ16  No studies 
Durable response: 60-70%29  Lower ITP-PAQ scores as compared with those without splenectomy34  
 
Rituximab Platelet counts >50 × 109/L 6 mo postinfusion: 40-60%38  No difference (9.2% vs 5.2%) compared with non-rituximab treatment or placebo37  No improvement as measured by change in ITP-PAQ or SF-3616,39  Possible increase with 22% of patients receiving rituximab reporting fatigue (8% on placebo)39  
Durable response: 21-26% 5 y after infusion38  
Romiplostim     
Adult trials Platelet count ≥50 × 109/L during ≥6 of the last 8 wk of treatment: 38% romiplostim vs 0% placebo11  No difference compared with non-romiplostim treatment or placebo11  Improvement in symptoms, activity, psychological health, and overall HRQoL as measured with the ITP-PAQ and EQ-5D No improvement meeting MID measured by ITP-PAQ16  
Platelet count ≥50 × 109/L: 71-92% romiplostim vs 0-51% placebo or non-romiplostim treatment46     
Long-term response (≥5 y): maintained by all patients for a median of 92% of study visits on stable doses24     
Pediatric trials Platelet count >50 × 109/L for 2 consecutive weeks: 88% romiplostim vs 0% placebo47  No difference compared with non-romiplostim treatment or placebo11  Reduced parental burden17   
Platelet counts >50 × 109/L were maintained for a median of 7 wk vs 0 wk for the placebo47     
Platelet count >50 × 109/L for ≥6 of 8 wk: 52% romiplostim vs 10% placebo12     
Long-term response (≥4 y): continued response on a tapering dose of romiplostim48     
Eltrombopag     
Adult trials Platelet count >50 × 109/L on day 43: 59% eltrombopag vs 16% placebo18  Decreased bleeding from baseline shown across trials in adults and children19,20  Improvement from baseline in physical, emotional, and mental function, as measured by SF-36v2 and FACT-thrombocytopenia18  Improvement in vitality on SF-36v2 compared with placebo27  
 Platelet count >50 × 109/L at least once; 79% eltrombopag vs 28% placebo49    Fatigue was reported as an adverse effect in 15% of patients in the EXTEND trial27  
 Long-term response (≥3 y): 62% platelet count >50 × 109/L in >50% of study assessments27     
Pediatric trials Platelet count >50 × 109/L: 62-75% eltrombopag vs 21-32% placebo19,21  Decreased bleeding from baseline shown across trials in adults and children19,20  No improvement in HRQoL by Kids’ ITP Tool scores21  Improvement in vitality on SF-36v2 compared with placebo27  
    Fatigue was reported as an adverse effect in 15% of patients in the EXTEND trial27  
 
Dapsone 40-62%45  No studies No studies No studies 
 
Mycophenolate mofetil 52-69%41  No studies No studies No studies 
 
Sirolimus 25-58%50,51  No studies No studies No studies 
*

Measure of platelet count response by platelet count is not consistent or comparable among studies.