Table 2

Patient and disease characteristics

CharacteristicFHCRC patients, n = 177MDACC patients, n = 67
Median age at transplantation, y (range) 41 (19-75) 39 (19-67) 
Median interval from diagnosis to HCT, mo 4.8 5.1 
Conditioning regimens, % 
    Myeloablative, TBI-based 45 43 
    Myeloablative, non–TBI-based 44 24 
    Reduced-intensity* 22 
    Nonmyeloablative 10 10 
Postgrafting immunosuppression, % 
    CSP + MTX 78 22 
    Tacrolimus + MTX 61 
    CSP + MMF 
    Other 11 17 
Hematopoietic cell source, % 
    G-PBMCs 35 42 
    Marrow 65 58 
Donor type, % 
    HLA-matched sibling 68 78 
    HLA-mismatched related 
    HLA-matched unrelated 22 15 
    HLA-allele–mismatched unrelated 
    HLA-antigen–mismatched unrelated 
Patient CMV serostatus, % 
    Negative 45 32 
    Positive 55 68 
Cytogenetic risks,% 
    Favorable 
    Intermediate 82 61 
    Unfavorable 15 36 
CharacteristicFHCRC patients, n = 177MDACC patients, n = 67
Median age at transplantation, y (range) 41 (19-75) 39 (19-67) 
Median interval from diagnosis to HCT, mo 4.8 5.1 
Conditioning regimens, % 
    Myeloablative, TBI-based 45 43 
    Myeloablative, non–TBI-based 44 24 
    Reduced-intensity* 22 
    Nonmyeloablative 10 10 
Postgrafting immunosuppression, % 
    CSP + MTX 78 22 
    Tacrolimus + MTX 61 
    CSP + MMF 
    Other 11 17 
Hematopoietic cell source, % 
    G-PBMCs 35 42 
    Marrow 65 58 
Donor type, % 
    HLA-matched sibling 68 78 
    HLA-mismatched related 
    HLA-matched unrelated 22 15 
    HLA-allele–mismatched unrelated 
    HLA-antigen–mismatched unrelated 
Patient CMV serostatus, % 
    Negative 45 32 
    Positive 55 68 
Cytogenetic risks,% 
    Favorable 
    Intermediate 82 61 
    Unfavorable 15 36 

HCT indicates hematopoietic cell transplantation; TBI, total body irradiation; CSP, cyclosporine; MTX, methotrexate; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; G-PBMC, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor–peripheral blood mononuclear cells; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; and CMV, cytomegalovirus.

*

Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens included fludarabine plus busulfan or melphalan.

Nonmyeloablative regimens included 2 Gy TBI plus or minus fludarabine or fludarabine/Ara-C/idarubicin.

Cytogenetic risks were assessed and broken down into 3 risk groups: favorable, intermediate, and unfavorable, according to the criteria of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG)/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal