Table 2

CD4 dynamics, TS stage, and response

ResponseNo.CD4 change, median cells/mm3 (range)Patients with increase of 150 or more CD4 cells from baseline to response, no. (%)TS prognostic group
Good, no. (%)Poor, no. (%)
CR 61 (−73 – +266) 4 (50) 4 (44) 5 (56) 
PR 21 −1 (−263 – +285) 2 (9) 9 (43) 12 (57) 
All resp 30 5 (−263 – +285) 6 (20) 1 (50) 1 (50) 
PD −72.5 (−164 – −14) 0 (0) 4 (100) 
SD/PD −27 (−164 – +221) 1 (16.6) 14 (39) 22 (61) 
ResponseNo.CD4 change, median cells/mm3 (range)Patients with increase of 150 or more CD4 cells from baseline to response, no. (%)TS prognostic group
Good, no. (%)Poor, no. (%)
CR 61 (−73 – +266) 4 (50) 4 (44) 5 (56) 
PR 21 −1 (−263 – +285) 2 (9) 9 (43) 12 (57) 
All resp 30 5 (−263 – +285) 6 (20) 1 (50) 1 (50) 
PD −72.5 (−164 – −14) 0 (0) 4 (100) 
SD/PD −27 (−164 – +221) 1 (16.6) 14 (39) 22 (61) 

Patients with T1S1 according to Nasti et al18  were considered to have poor-prognosis KS. Of the 3 patients who had not received one month of highly active antiretroviral therapy at entry, one had a PR, one had a pathological CR, and one had a clinical CR. A Cochran-Armitage trend test shows no association between CD4 cell change and response (P2 = .19).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal