Table 1.

Features of hemagglutination and PCR-based assays for blood groups antigens.

Hemagglutination
  • ▪ Value

    • The “Gold Standard” method to detect the presence or absence of blood group antigens on RBCs that has served the transfusion community well

    • Simple and quick to perform, requires little in the way of equipment, and, when done correctly, has a specificity and sensitivity that is appropriate for the vast majority of transfusions

    • Detects mixed populations of RBCs

  • ▪ Reagents

    • Specialized and obtained from immunized patients/donors (polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies) or from immunized mice (monoclonal antibodies)

    • Source material is a biohazard and is diminishing

    • Cost of FDA-approved, commercially licensed reagents is escalating

    • Many antibodies are not commercially available and are characterized (often only partially) by the user and some are limited in volume, weakly reactive, or not available

  • ▪ Limitations

    • Is a subjective test

    • Requires use of reliable antisera

    • Labor-intensive testing so a relatively small number of donors can be typed for a relatively small number of antigens, which has limited the size of antigen-negative inventories

    • Indirect indication of a fetus at risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn

    • Difficult to phenotype a recently transfused patient

    • Difficult to phenotype RBCs coated with IgG

    • Can be difficult to distinguish an alloantibody from an autoantibody in antigen-positive people

    • Restricted ability to determine zygosity, especially RHD zygosity in D-positive individuals

 
DNA testing, including DNA arrays
  • ▪ Value

    • Can be automated

    • High throughput because multiple markers are tested simultaneously on one sample

    • Computerized interpretation and data entry into a patient/donor data base

    • Potential to precisely geno-match donor blood to the patient’s type

  • ▪ Reagents

    • Does not require special reagents, which can be readily purchased

  • ▪ Limitations

    • Predict an antigen type; it is recommended that the prediction be confirmed by hemagglutination, particularly if negative for the antigen

    • Takes hours

    • DNA and hemagglutination test results may not agree

    • DNA results from somatic cells and from WBCs may not agree

    • More than one genotype can give rise to the same phenotype, especially with the null phenotypes

    • There is a high probability that not all alleles in all ethnic populations are known

    • For research use only; has not been approved by the FDA as the sole test on which to base decisions regarding patient care

 
Hemagglutination
  • ▪ Value

    • The “Gold Standard” method to detect the presence or absence of blood group antigens on RBCs that has served the transfusion community well

    • Simple and quick to perform, requires little in the way of equipment, and, when done correctly, has a specificity and sensitivity that is appropriate for the vast majority of transfusions

    • Detects mixed populations of RBCs

  • ▪ Reagents

    • Specialized and obtained from immunized patients/donors (polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies) or from immunized mice (monoclonal antibodies)

    • Source material is a biohazard and is diminishing

    • Cost of FDA-approved, commercially licensed reagents is escalating

    • Many antibodies are not commercially available and are characterized (often only partially) by the user and some are limited in volume, weakly reactive, or not available

  • ▪ Limitations

    • Is a subjective test

    • Requires use of reliable antisera

    • Labor-intensive testing so a relatively small number of donors can be typed for a relatively small number of antigens, which has limited the size of antigen-negative inventories

    • Indirect indication of a fetus at risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus/newborn

    • Difficult to phenotype a recently transfused patient

    • Difficult to phenotype RBCs coated with IgG

    • Can be difficult to distinguish an alloantibody from an autoantibody in antigen-positive people

    • Restricted ability to determine zygosity, especially RHD zygosity in D-positive individuals

 
DNA testing, including DNA arrays
  • ▪ Value

    • Can be automated

    • High throughput because multiple markers are tested simultaneously on one sample

    • Computerized interpretation and data entry into a patient/donor data base

    • Potential to precisely geno-match donor blood to the patient’s type

  • ▪ Reagents

    • Does not require special reagents, which can be readily purchased

  • ▪ Limitations

    • Predict an antigen type; it is recommended that the prediction be confirmed by hemagglutination, particularly if negative for the antigen

    • Takes hours

    • DNA and hemagglutination test results may not agree

    • DNA results from somatic cells and from WBCs may not agree

    • More than one genotype can give rise to the same phenotype, especially with the null phenotypes

    • There is a high probability that not all alleles in all ethnic populations are known

    • For research use only; has not been approved by the FDA as the sole test on which to base decisions regarding patient care

 

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal