Dichotomized GVHD grades as predictors of day-200 NRM in the validation data set of 193 patients
Grading algorithm . | True positive, % . | False positive, % . |
|---|---|---|
| Przepiorka et al4 | ||
| I vs II-IV | 100 | 99 |
| I-II vs III-IV | 61 | 30 |
| I-III vs IV | 19 | 2 |
| International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry5 ,10 | ||
| A vs B-D | 100 | 99 |
| A-B vs C-D | 81 | 74 |
| A-C vs D | 21 | 2 |
Grading algorithm . | True positive, % . | False positive, % . |
|---|---|---|
| Przepiorka et al4 | ||
| I vs II-IV | 100 | 99 |
| I-II vs III-IV | 61 | 30 |
| I-III vs IV | 19 | 2 |
| International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry5 ,10 | ||
| A vs B-D | 100 | 99 |
| A-B vs C-D | 81 | 74 |
| A-C vs D | 21 | 2 |