Table 2.

Categorical analysis of anti–PF4/heparin antibody seroconversion events


Study and study drug

No. patients

Group 1, no. (%)*

P

Group 2, no. (%)

P

Combined, no. (%)

P
Knee (PENTAMAKS)14     > .999    .07    .13  
    Enoxaparin   365   5 (1.4)    14 (3.8)    19 (5.2)   
    Fondaparinux   388   5 (1.3)    6 (1.5)    11 (2.8)   
Hip (PENTATHLON)15     .37    > .999    .55  
    Enoxaparin   984   1 (0.1)    10 (1.0)    11 (1.1)   
    Fondaparinux
 
989
 
4 (0.4)
 

 
11 (1.1)
 

 
15 (1.5)
 

 

Study and study drug

No. patients

Group 1, no. (%)*

P

Group 2, no. (%)

P

Combined, no. (%)

P
Knee (PENTAMAKS)14     > .999    .07    .13  
    Enoxaparin   365   5 (1.4)    14 (3.8)    19 (5.2)   
    Fondaparinux   388   5 (1.3)    6 (1.5)    11 (2.8)   
Hip (PENTATHLON)15     .37    > .999    .55  
    Enoxaparin   984   1 (0.1)    10 (1.0)    11 (1.1)   
    Fondaparinux
 
989
 
4 (0.4)
 

 
11 (1.1)
 

 
15 (1.5)
 

 
*

Group 1 defined as formation of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies of IgG class from a negative baseline. Four patients in group 1 tested positive for heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in the serotonin release assay (knee study: 1 in enoxaparin group, 2 in fondaparinux group; hip study: 1 in fondaparinux group).

Group 2 consisted of all non—group 1 patients who had evidence for an immune response, including the formation of IgM or IgA or both (but not IgG) anti—PF4/heparin antibodies or who had a positive test at baseline, but subsequently developed at least a 2-fold increase in reactivity in the EIA (by change in OD).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal