Table 2.

Summary of efficacy (liso-cel–treated efficacy analysis set)

Liso-cel–treated efficacy analysis set (n = 61)
ORR (CR + PR), n (%) [95% CI]  49 (80) [68-89] 
CR rate, n (%) [95% CI]  33 (54) [41-67] 
BOR, n (%)  
CR 33 (54) 
PR 16 (26) 
SD 3 (5) 
PD 8 (13) 
NE 1 (2) 
DOR  
Median (95% CI), mo  23.3 (6.2 to NR) 
Continued response at 12 months, % (95% CI)  55 (40-68) 
Continued response at 18 months, % (95% CI)  53 (37-66) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  23.1 (22.9-23.3) 
PFS  
Median (95% CI), mo  9.0 (4.2 to NR) 
12-month PFS rate, % (95% CI)  47 (33-59) 
18-month PFS rate, % (95% CI)  43 (30-55) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  24.0 (23.8-24.2) 
EFS  
Median (95% CI), mo  7.2 (3.2-24.3) 
12-month EFS rate, % (95% CI)  44 (31-56) 
18-month EFS rate, % (95% CI)  40 (28-52) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  24.0 (23.8-24.2) 
OS  
Median (95% CI), mo  NR (16.3 to NR) 
12-month OS rate, % (95% CI)  68 (55-78) 
18-month OS rate, % (95% CI)  59 (45-70) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  24.3 (24.0-24.8) 
Liso-cel–treated efficacy analysis set (n = 61)
ORR (CR + PR), n (%) [95% CI]  49 (80) [68-89] 
CR rate, n (%) [95% CI]  33 (54) [41-67] 
BOR, n (%)  
CR 33 (54) 
PR 16 (26) 
SD 3 (5) 
PD 8 (13) 
NE 1 (2) 
DOR  
Median (95% CI), mo  23.3 (6.2 to NR) 
Continued response at 12 months, % (95% CI)  55 (40-68) 
Continued response at 18 months, % (95% CI)  53 (37-66) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  23.1 (22.9-23.3) 
PFS  
Median (95% CI), mo  9.0 (4.2 to NR) 
12-month PFS rate, % (95% CI)  47 (33-59) 
18-month PFS rate, % (95% CI)  43 (30-55) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  24.0 (23.8-24.2) 
EFS  
Median (95% CI), mo  7.2 (3.2-24.3) 
12-month EFS rate, % (95% CI)  44 (31-56) 
18-month EFS rate, % (95% CI)  40 (28-52) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  24.0 (23.8-24.2) 
OS  
Median (95% CI), mo  NR (16.3 to NR) 
12-month OS rate, % (95% CI)  68 (55-78) 
18-month OS rate, % (95% CI)  59 (45-70) 
Median follow-up (95% CI), mo  24.3 (24.0-24.8) 

BOR, best overall response; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease.

Two-sided 95% exact Clopper-Pearson CIs.

Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain 2-sided 95% CIs.

Reverse Kaplan-Meier method was used to obtain the median follow-up and 95% CIs.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal