Table 4.

Multivariate competing risk regression analysis for relapse at 3 years after alloHCT

Multivariable analysis with variables at diagnosisHR95% confidence intervalP value
CK at diagnosis (vs not) 2.56 0.98-6.68 .055 
ICC-defined TP53mut MN (vs does not meet) 2.02 0.85-4.77 .11 
Non-DBD TP53mut only (vs ≥1 DBD mutation) 2.09 0.8-5.48 .13 
DNMT3A comutation (vs not) 2.47 1.15-5.32 .021 
Multivariable analysis with variables at diagnosisHR95% confidence intervalP value
CK at diagnosis (vs not) 2.56 0.98-6.68 .055 
ICC-defined TP53mut MN (vs does not meet) 2.02 0.85-4.77 .11 
Non-DBD TP53mut only (vs ≥1 DBD mutation) 2.09 0.8-5.48 .13 
DNMT3A comutation (vs not) 2.47 1.15-5.32 .021 
Multivariable analysis with variables at pre-alloHCTHR95% confidence intervalP value
Cytogenetic response    
CK at diagnosis, but not pre-alloHCT (vs no CK) 2.1 0.87-5.05 .1 
CK pre-alloHCT (vs no CK) 2.33 0.93-5.86 .071 
Melphalan-based conditioning (vs no melphalan) 0.56 0.33-0.95 .032 
PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis (vs not) 1.49 0.88-2.52 .14 
Pre-alloHCT BM blasts ≥5% (vs <5% blasts) 1.71 0.73-4.02 .22 
Multivariable analysis with variables at pre-alloHCTHR95% confidence intervalP value
Cytogenetic response    
CK at diagnosis, but not pre-alloHCT (vs no CK) 2.1 0.87-5.05 .1 
CK pre-alloHCT (vs no CK) 2.33 0.93-5.86 .071 
Melphalan-based conditioning (vs no melphalan) 0.56 0.33-0.95 .032 
PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis (vs not) 1.49 0.88-2.52 .14 
Pre-alloHCT BM blasts ≥5% (vs <5% blasts) 1.71 0.73-4.02 .22 

Boldface values indicate statistically significant at P < 0.05.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal