Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with concurrent or sequential MN and AITL diagnosis
Patients . | Sex . | MN . | Clonal relationship . | Age (MN), y . | Age (AITL), y . | Interval between MN and AITL . | Biopsy site and DNA source (MN) . | Percent AITL involvement . | Biopsy site and DNA source (AITL) . | MN treatments . | AITL treatments . | Survival from AITL diagnosis (mo) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients with MN-AITL with paired NGS sequencing (n = 15) | |||||||||||||
1 | Male | CMML | Related | 76 | 78 | 16 months | PB | Not involved# | LN | allo-HSCT | BV-CHP, allo-HSCT | Alive (21) | MSKCC |
2 | Male | CMML | Related | 50 | 55 | 60 months | BM | Not involved# | LN | allo-HSCT | BV-CHP, allo-HSCT | Alive (29) | MSKCC |
3 | Male | MDS | Related | 75 | 75 | Synchronous | BM (FC sorted) | 2.1% by FC | BM (FC sorted) | EPOCH | Supportive care | Deceased (0.2) | 5 |
4 | Female | MDS | Related | 80 | 86 | 72 months | BM | NA | LN | Not treated | CHOP, azacitidine | Deceased (20) | 6 |
5 | NA | PV, post-PV MF | Related | NA | NA | NA | BM | NA | LN | NA | NA | NA | 7 |
6 | Female | PV | Related | 84 | 86 | 24 months | PB | NA | LN | Phlebotomy, hydroxyurea | BV | Deceased (12) | 8 |
7 | Male | MDS | Related | 78 | 81 | 42 months | BM | Not involved∗ | LN | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
8 | Male | CMML | Related | 83 | 83 | Synchronous | BM | ∼5%∗ | LN | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
9 | Female | MDS | Related | 73 | 73 | Synchronous | BM | Not involved∗ | LN | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
10 | Male | PMF | Related | 64 | 64 | Synchronous | BM | NA | LN | Not treated | CHOP | Deceased (64) | 10 |
11 | Female | ET | Related | 73 | 76 | 31 months | BM | NA | LN | Supportive care | CHOP | Deceased (98) | 10 |
12 | Male | ET | Related | 60 | 65 | 58 months | BM | NA | LN | Supportive care | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (72) | 10 |
13 | Female | PV | Unrelated | 72 | 76 | 42 months | BM | NA | LN | Phlebotomy, hydroxyurea | Supportive care | Deceased (1) | 10 |
14 | Female | MPN-U | NAΔ | 62 | 62 | Synchronous | BM | Involved∗ | LN | Not treated | CHOEP, ASCT | Alive (NA) | 10 |
15 | Male | CMML | Related | 70 | 70 | Synchronous | BM | Not involved## | LN | Azacitidine | Azacitidine, romidepsin | Alive (7) | 11 |
Patients with AITL-MN with paired NGS sequencing (n = 10) | |||||||||||||
16 | Male | MDS | Related | 76 | 75 | 10 months | BM | 0.014% by FC | LN | Azacitidine | R-CHOP, ruxolitinib, duvelisib | Deceased (17) | MSKCC |
17 | Male | CMML | Related | 76 | 73 | 32 months | BM | 0.036% by FC | LN | NA | Lenalidomide-CHOEP, ASCT, and cerdulatinib | Deceased (61) | MSKCC |
18 | Male | MDS | Related | 79 | 74 | 66 months | BM | 1% by FC | LN | Luspatercept, romiplostim | CHOP, ASCT, romidepsin, bortezomib, duvelisib, ruxolitinib, and valemetostat | Deceased (109) | MSKCC |
19 | Female | AML, therapy related | Unrelated | 83 | 80 | 34 months | BM | 0.1% by FC | Tonsil | Azacitidine, venetoclax, | Mini-CHOP, duvelisib, romidepsin, and TTI-621 | Deceased (78) | MSKCC |
20 | Female | MPN (favored CNL) | Related | 75 | 72 | 36 months | BM | 0.004% by FC | LN | Not treated | CHOP, duvelisib, romidepsin, bortezomib, BV, and valemetostat | Deceased (43) | MSKCC |
21 | Male | MDS | Unrelated | 56 | 55 | 14 months | PB | 0.03% by FC | LN | Supportive care | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (16) | MSKCC |
22 | Male | AML MECOM rearranged | Related | 75 | 72 | 46 months | BM | Not involved by FC | LN | Azacitidine | CHOEP, romidepsin lenalidomide, and carfilzomib | Deceased (58) | MSKCC |
23 | NA | CMML | Related | NA | NA | NA | BM | NA | LN | NA | NA | NA | 7 |
24 | Male | MDS | Related | 67 | 64 | 36 months | BM | NA | LN | Azacitidine | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (48) | 12 |
25 | Male | AML NPM1 mutated | Related | 46 | 45 | 12 months | BM | NA | LN | FLAIE | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (18) | 3 |
Patients . | Sex . | MN . | Clonal relationship . | Age (MN), y . | Age (AITL), y . | Interval between MN and AITL . | Biopsy site and DNA source (MN) . | Percent AITL involvement . | Biopsy site and DNA source (AITL) . | MN treatments . | AITL treatments . | Survival from AITL diagnosis (mo) . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patients with MN-AITL with paired NGS sequencing (n = 15) | |||||||||||||
1 | Male | CMML | Related | 76 | 78 | 16 months | PB | Not involved# | LN | allo-HSCT | BV-CHP, allo-HSCT | Alive (21) | MSKCC |
2 | Male | CMML | Related | 50 | 55 | 60 months | BM | Not involved# | LN | allo-HSCT | BV-CHP, allo-HSCT | Alive (29) | MSKCC |
3 | Male | MDS | Related | 75 | 75 | Synchronous | BM (FC sorted) | 2.1% by FC | BM (FC sorted) | EPOCH | Supportive care | Deceased (0.2) | 5 |
4 | Female | MDS | Related | 80 | 86 | 72 months | BM | NA | LN | Not treated | CHOP, azacitidine | Deceased (20) | 6 |
5 | NA | PV, post-PV MF | Related | NA | NA | NA | BM | NA | LN | NA | NA | NA | 7 |
6 | Female | PV | Related | 84 | 86 | 24 months | PB | NA | LN | Phlebotomy, hydroxyurea | BV | Deceased (12) | 8 |
7 | Male | MDS | Related | 78 | 81 | 42 months | BM | Not involved∗ | LN | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
8 | Male | CMML | Related | 83 | 83 | Synchronous | BM | ∼5%∗ | LN | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
9 | Female | MDS | Related | 73 | 73 | Synchronous | BM | Not involved∗ | LN | NA | NA | NA | 9 |
10 | Male | PMF | Related | 64 | 64 | Synchronous | BM | NA | LN | Not treated | CHOP | Deceased (64) | 10 |
11 | Female | ET | Related | 73 | 76 | 31 months | BM | NA | LN | Supportive care | CHOP | Deceased (98) | 10 |
12 | Male | ET | Related | 60 | 65 | 58 months | BM | NA | LN | Supportive care | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (72) | 10 |
13 | Female | PV | Unrelated | 72 | 76 | 42 months | BM | NA | LN | Phlebotomy, hydroxyurea | Supportive care | Deceased (1) | 10 |
14 | Female | MPN-U | NAΔ | 62 | 62 | Synchronous | BM | Involved∗ | LN | Not treated | CHOEP, ASCT | Alive (NA) | 10 |
15 | Male | CMML | Related | 70 | 70 | Synchronous | BM | Not involved## | LN | Azacitidine | Azacitidine, romidepsin | Alive (7) | 11 |
Patients with AITL-MN with paired NGS sequencing (n = 10) | |||||||||||||
16 | Male | MDS | Related | 76 | 75 | 10 months | BM | 0.014% by FC | LN | Azacitidine | R-CHOP, ruxolitinib, duvelisib | Deceased (17) | MSKCC |
17 | Male | CMML | Related | 76 | 73 | 32 months | BM | 0.036% by FC | LN | NA | Lenalidomide-CHOEP, ASCT, and cerdulatinib | Deceased (61) | MSKCC |
18 | Male | MDS | Related | 79 | 74 | 66 months | BM | 1% by FC | LN | Luspatercept, romiplostim | CHOP, ASCT, romidepsin, bortezomib, duvelisib, ruxolitinib, and valemetostat | Deceased (109) | MSKCC |
19 | Female | AML, therapy related | Unrelated | 83 | 80 | 34 months | BM | 0.1% by FC | Tonsil | Azacitidine, venetoclax, | Mini-CHOP, duvelisib, romidepsin, and TTI-621 | Deceased (78) | MSKCC |
20 | Female | MPN (favored CNL) | Related | 75 | 72 | 36 months | BM | 0.004% by FC | LN | Not treated | CHOP, duvelisib, romidepsin, bortezomib, BV, and valemetostat | Deceased (43) | MSKCC |
21 | Male | MDS | Unrelated | 56 | 55 | 14 months | PB | 0.03% by FC | LN | Supportive care | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (16) | MSKCC |
22 | Male | AML MECOM rearranged | Related | 75 | 72 | 46 months | BM | Not involved by FC | LN | Azacitidine | CHOEP, romidepsin lenalidomide, and carfilzomib | Deceased (58) | MSKCC |
23 | NA | CMML | Related | NA | NA | NA | BM | NA | LN | NA | NA | NA | 7 |
24 | Male | MDS | Related | 67 | 64 | 36 months | BM | NA | LN | Azacitidine | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (48) | 12 |
25 | Male | AML NPM1 mutated | Related | 46 | 45 | 12 months | BM | NA | LN | FLAIE | CHOEP, ASCT | Deceased (18) | 3 |
allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; BM, bone marrow; BV, brentuximab vedotin; BV-CHP, brentuximab vedotin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisolone; CHOEP, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, vincristine sulfate, etoposide, and prednisone; CMML, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; CNL, chronic neutrophilic leukemia; EPOCH, etoposide, prednisolone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and hydroxydaunorubicin; ET, essential thrombocythemia; FC, flow cytometric study; FLAIE, fludarabine, cytarabine, etoposide, idarubicin; LN, lymph node; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MF, myelofibros; MPN, myeloproliferative neoplasm; MPN-U, myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable; NA, not available; PB, peripheral blood; PMF, primary myelofibrosis; PV, polycythemia vera; R-CHOP, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone.
NGS studies for MNs in cases #1 and #2 were performed on samples obtained at the time of initial MN diagnosis, which occurred several years prior to the development of AITL. As a result, the MN samples were uninvolved by AITL based on flow cytometric and morphologic analysis.
The extent of bone marrow involvement by AITL was assessed by review of histomorphology and immunohistochemical staining.
The methodology to assess AITL involvement was not specified.
We excluded this patient from clonal relatedness assessment due to ambiguous genetic findings: the bone marrow sample was involved by AITL (extent of involvement was not specified in the original paper); the bone marrow and AITL samples shared only an IDH2 mutation with a 2% VAF in both samples and a RHOA mutation was only reported in the bone marrow but not in the AITL sample.