Table 1.

Demographics and cytogenetic characteristics of all patients

Total (N = 52)R140-m (n = 33)R172-m (n = 19)P value 
Age, median (IQR) 63 (53-68) 62 (52-68) 64 (60-67) .4 
Sex, female 28 (54%) 16 (48%) 12 (63%) .3 
Race .1 
White 37 (82%) 25 (89%) 12 (71%)  
Asian 5 (11%) 3 (11%) 2 (12%)  
Black 3 (6.7%) 3 (18%)  
Unknown  
Blast percentage at diagnosis, median (IQR) 55 (33-70) 53 (23-67) 60 (43-75) .082 
ELN 2022 riskcategory <.001 
Favorable 13 (25%) 13 (39%)  
Intermediate 10 (19%) 3 (9.1%) 7 (37%)  
Adverse 29 (56%) 17 (52%) 12 (63%)  
AML classification(ICC 202220 ) <.001 
AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities 14 (27%) 14 (42%)  
AML with MDS-related gene mutations 26 (50%) 14 (42%) 12 (63%)  
MDS/AML with MDS-related gene mutations 4 (7.7%) 4 (12%)  
AML with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities 2 (3.8%) 1 (3%) 1 (5.3%)  
AML, NOS 6 (12%) 6 (32%)  
Cytogenetics 
Normal karyotype 24 (46%) 16 (48%) 8 (42%) .7 
Other karyotypes 
Trisomy 8 8 (15%) 4 (12%) 4 (21%) .4 
Trisomy 11 4 (7.7%) 2 (6.1%) 2 (11%) .6 
Trisomy 21 2 (3.8%) 2 (6.1%) .5 
Monosomy 7 2 (3.8%) 2 (6.1%) .5 
Molecular 
NPM1 13 (25%) 13 (39%) .002 
FLT3 3 (5.8%) 3 (9%) .3 
DNMT3A 22 (44%) 14 (45%) 8 (42%) .8 
RUNX1 15 (30%) 10 (32%) 5 (26%) .7 
NRAS 5 (10%) 5 (16%) .14 
BCOR 10 (26%) 4 (18%) 6 (38%) .3 
SRSF2 14 (38%) 12 (55%) 2 (13%) .011 
ASXL1 8 (16%) 5 (16%) 3 (16%) >.9 
Induction regimen .8 
7+3 28 (54%) 17 (52%) 11 (59%)  
7+3+enasidenib 11 (21%) 7 (21%) 4 (21%)  
7+3+FLT3 inhibitor 5 (10%) 3 (9%) 2 (10%)  
CPX-351 8 (15%) 6 (18%) 2 (10%)  
Induction intensity .8 
Dauno60 30 (58%) 18 (54%) 12 (63%)  
Dauno90 12 (23%) 8 (24%) 4 (21%)  
Idarubicin 12 2 (4%) 1 (3%) 1 (5%)  
CPX-351 8 (15%) 6 (18%) 2 (11%)  
Total (N = 52)R140-m (n = 33)R172-m (n = 19)P value 
Age, median (IQR) 63 (53-68) 62 (52-68) 64 (60-67) .4 
Sex, female 28 (54%) 16 (48%) 12 (63%) .3 
Race .1 
White 37 (82%) 25 (89%) 12 (71%)  
Asian 5 (11%) 3 (11%) 2 (12%)  
Black 3 (6.7%) 3 (18%)  
Unknown  
Blast percentage at diagnosis, median (IQR) 55 (33-70) 53 (23-67) 60 (43-75) .082 
ELN 2022 riskcategory <.001 
Favorable 13 (25%) 13 (39%)  
Intermediate 10 (19%) 3 (9.1%) 7 (37%)  
Adverse 29 (56%) 17 (52%) 12 (63%)  
AML classification(ICC 202220 ) <.001 
AML with recurrent genetic abnormalities 14 (27%) 14 (42%)  
AML with MDS-related gene mutations 26 (50%) 14 (42%) 12 (63%)  
MDS/AML with MDS-related gene mutations 4 (7.7%) 4 (12%)  
AML with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities 2 (3.8%) 1 (3%) 1 (5.3%)  
AML, NOS 6 (12%) 6 (32%)  
Cytogenetics 
Normal karyotype 24 (46%) 16 (48%) 8 (42%) .7 
Other karyotypes 
Trisomy 8 8 (15%) 4 (12%) 4 (21%) .4 
Trisomy 11 4 (7.7%) 2 (6.1%) 2 (11%) .6 
Trisomy 21 2 (3.8%) 2 (6.1%) .5 
Monosomy 7 2 (3.8%) 2 (6.1%) .5 
Molecular 
NPM1 13 (25%) 13 (39%) .002 
FLT3 3 (5.8%) 3 (9%) .3 
DNMT3A 22 (44%) 14 (45%) 8 (42%) .8 
RUNX1 15 (30%) 10 (32%) 5 (26%) .7 
NRAS 5 (10%) 5 (16%) .14 
BCOR 10 (26%) 4 (18%) 6 (38%) .3 
SRSF2 14 (38%) 12 (55%) 2 (13%) .011 
ASXL1 8 (16%) 5 (16%) 3 (16%) >.9 
Induction regimen .8 
7+3 28 (54%) 17 (52%) 11 (59%)  
7+3+enasidenib 11 (21%) 7 (21%) 4 (21%)  
7+3+FLT3 inhibitor 5 (10%) 3 (9%) 2 (10%)  
CPX-351 8 (15%) 6 (18%) 2 (10%)  
Induction intensity .8 
Dauno60 30 (58%) 18 (54%) 12 (63%)  
Dauno90 12 (23%) 8 (24%) 4 (21%)  
Idarubicin 12 2 (4%) 1 (3%) 1 (5%)  
CPX-351 8 (15%) 6 (18%) 2 (11%)  

Boldface values indicate statistically significant results with P < .05.

7+3, anthracycline + cytarabine; Dauno60, 60 mg/m2 of daunorubicin; Dauno90, 90 mg/m2 of daunorubicin; ICC, international consensus classification; Idarubicin 12, 12 mg/m2 of idarubicin; IQR, interquartile range; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; NOS, not otherwise specified.

Wilcoxon rank sum exact test; Pearson χ2 test; Fisher's exact test; Wilcoxon rank sum test.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal