Table 4.

Association of SDOH with mortality after allo-HCT (n = 315)

VariableHazard ratio95% CIP valueGlobal P value
Median income 1.00 1.00-1.00 .558  
Proportion with less than a high school education 1.18 0.87-1.60 .283  
Proportion below federal poverty level 1.04 0.79-1.36 .804  
Proportion on SNAP 1.13 0.92-1.38 .240  
Proportion spending ≥30% of their income on housing 1.03 0.78-1.35 .845  
Proportion with a second mortgage or a home equity loan 0.99 0.73-1.36 .970  
Proportion on SSI 1.21 0.81-1.82 .345  
Proportion driving to work alone 0.96 0.85-1.10 .570  
Race     
White  --- .722 
Asian 0.91 0.40-2.09   
Black 0.98 0.45-2.17   
Other 0.44 0.11-1.80   
Race      
White  --- .528 
Asian 0.80 0.35-1.81   
Black 0.77 0.36-1.65   
Other 0.41 0.10-1.65   
VariableHazard ratio95% CIP valueGlobal P value
Median income 1.00 1.00-1.00 .558  
Proportion with less than a high school education 1.18 0.87-1.60 .283  
Proportion below federal poverty level 1.04 0.79-1.36 .804  
Proportion on SNAP 1.13 0.92-1.38 .240  
Proportion spending ≥30% of their income on housing 1.03 0.78-1.35 .845  
Proportion with a second mortgage or a home equity loan 0.99 0.73-1.36 .970  
Proportion on SSI 1.21 0.81-1.82 .345  
Proportion driving to work alone 0.96 0.85-1.10 .570  
Race     
White  --- .722 
Asian 0.91 0.40-2.09   
Black 0.98 0.45-2.17   
Other 0.44 0.11-1.80   
Race      
White  --- .528 
Asian 0.80 0.35-1.81   
Black 0.77 0.36-1.65   
Other 0.41 0.10-1.65   

Each row represents 1 model for 1 SDOH variable adjusted for age and HCT-CI; each as a continuous linear variable; relapsed/refractory AML vs newly diagnosed, intermediate vs unfavorable cytogenetics, status at HCT (CR1 vs other), and intensity of induction therapy.

Unadjusted model (univariate analysis).