Table 3.

Treatment patterns and durable response among OligoCD and iMCD subtypes

TAFRO
n = 65
IPL
n = 12
NOS
n = 42
OligoCD
n = 14
UCD
n = 46
No. of regimens administered, median (IQR) 3 (2-4) 4 (2.8-5) 3 (2-4) 2 (2-3) 1 (1-2) 
LN excision (partial or complete)      
Ever received, n 11 10 31 14 43 
Response evaluable, n 10 25 19 
Response ratio (%) 0/10 (0) 0/9 (0) 2/25 (8) 1/6 (16.7) 12/19 (63.2) 
Response unknown, n 24 
Steroid monotherapy      
Ever received, n 27 14 
Response evaluable, n 24 10 
Response ratio (%) 0/24 (0) 0/5 (0) 2/10 (20) 0/1 (0) 0/1 (0) 
Response unknown, n 
Anti–IL-6 w/wo steroids       
Ever received, n 39 10 21 
Response evaluable, n 36 10 16 
Response ratio (%) 16/36 (44.4) 6/10 (60) 7/16 (43.8) 1/2 (50) 1/3 (33.3) 
Response unknown, n 
Siltuximab ± steroids      
Ever received, n 28 20 
Response evaluable, n 24 15 
Response ratio (%) 11/24 (45.8) 5/8 (62.5) 6/15 (40) 1/2 (50) 1/3 (33.3) 
Response unknown, n 
Tocilizumab w/wo steroids      
Ever received, n 15 
Response evaluable, n 14 
Response ratio (%) 5/14 (35.7) 2/3 (66.7) 1/1 (100) 0/1 (0) 
Response unknown, n 
Rituximab w/wo steroids      
Ever received, n 12 21 
Response evaluable, n 11 12 
Response ratio (%) 3/11 (27.3) 0/6 (0) 3/12 (25) 0/3 (0) 1/4 (25) 
Response unknown, n 
Chemotherapy w/wo other agents      
Ever received, n 29 
Response evaluable, n 23 
Response ratio (%) 11/23 (47.8) 1/2 (50) 0/2 (0) 0/2 (0) 
Response unknown, n 
Other      
Ever received, n 37 10 
Response evaluable, n 33 
Response ratio (%) 14/33 (42.4) 0/4 (0) 3/9 (33.3) 1/2 (50.0) 2/4 (50) 
Response unknown, n 
TAFRO
n = 65
IPL
n = 12
NOS
n = 42
OligoCD
n = 14
UCD
n = 46
No. of regimens administered, median (IQR) 3 (2-4) 4 (2.8-5) 3 (2-4) 2 (2-3) 1 (1-2) 
LN excision (partial or complete)      
Ever received, n 11 10 31 14 43 
Response evaluable, n 10 25 19 
Response ratio (%) 0/10 (0) 0/9 (0) 2/25 (8) 1/6 (16.7) 12/19 (63.2) 
Response unknown, n 24 
Steroid monotherapy      
Ever received, n 27 14 
Response evaluable, n 24 10 
Response ratio (%) 0/24 (0) 0/5 (0) 2/10 (20) 0/1 (0) 0/1 (0) 
Response unknown, n 
Anti–IL-6 w/wo steroids       
Ever received, n 39 10 21 
Response evaluable, n 36 10 16 
Response ratio (%) 16/36 (44.4) 6/10 (60) 7/16 (43.8) 1/2 (50) 1/3 (33.3) 
Response unknown, n 
Siltuximab ± steroids      
Ever received, n 28 20 
Response evaluable, n 24 15 
Response ratio (%) 11/24 (45.8) 5/8 (62.5) 6/15 (40) 1/2 (50) 1/3 (33.3) 
Response unknown, n 
Tocilizumab w/wo steroids      
Ever received, n 15 
Response evaluable, n 14 
Response ratio (%) 5/14 (35.7) 2/3 (66.7) 1/1 (100) 0/1 (0) 
Response unknown, n 
Rituximab w/wo steroids      
Ever received, n 12 21 
Response evaluable, n 11 12 
Response ratio (%) 3/11 (27.3) 0/6 (0) 3/12 (25) 0/3 (0) 1/4 (25) 
Response unknown, n 
Chemotherapy w/wo other agents      
Ever received, n 29 
Response evaluable, n 23 
Response ratio (%) 11/23 (47.8) 1/2 (50) 0/2 (0) 0/2 (0) 
Response unknown, n 
Other      
Ever received, n 37 10 
Response evaluable, n 33 
Response ratio (%) 14/33 (42.4) 0/4 (0) 3/9 (33.3) 1/2 (50.0) 2/4 (50) 
Response unknown, n 

Response assessment was determined according to the change in the proportion of symptoms present before and after a given regimen was initiated. A response was recorded if there was at least 50% improvement in the proportion of symptoms present after a regimen initiation compared with before or at the time of initiation.

w/wo, with/without.

Inclusive of patients ever treated with either siltuximab w/wo steroids and/or tocilizumab w/wo steroids. Best response among those regimens is listed.